Developing a horse welfare assessment protocol

被引:20
作者
Viksten, S. M. [1 ]
Visser, E. K. [2 ]
Nyman, S. [3 ]
Blokhuis, H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, Box 7068, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Horsonality, Skipper 3, NL-8456 JB De Knipe, Netherlands
[3] Wallby Sateri, 574 96 Vetlanda, Skiro, Sweden
关键词
animal welfare; assessment; equine; horse; protocol; Welfare Quality (R); ANIMAL-WELFARE; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.26.1.059
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This paper describes the development and pilot-testing of a horse welfare assessment protocol (HWAP). The HWAP consists of the collective measurement of numerous factors considered likely to affect a horse's welfare and is thereby designed to provide a holistic score of its welfare status and to identify potential risk factors. The draft protocol contains 47 measures: 15 animal-based, 24 resource-based and eight management-based. It was tested in the autumn at two Swedish riding schools using a total of 37 horses of varying breed, gender and age. Each assessment was repeated after 16-25 days. The results showed that 66% (31/47) of the measures had over 85% repeatability between assessments. Results indicated occurrence of behavioural issues, eg aggression and avoidance, and potential risk factors, such as inadequate management routines and feeding regimes. Using the HWAP, the assessment of up to 22 horses could be carried out in one day. Changes were proposed to the draft protocol which included incorporating an ethogram to assess the human-animal relationship and assessing bit-related injuries. We propose that the protocol might: i) provide a firm basis for the welfare monitoring of horses; ii) identify important potential risk factors; iii) guide welfare improvement and management practices for horse owners and stable managers; and iv) contribute to the development of certification schemes for horse facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Developing an Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Cows in Extensive Beef Cow-Calf Systems in New Zealand. Part 2: Categorisation and Scoring of Welfare Assessment Measures
    Kaurivi, Y. Baby
    Hickson, Rebecca
    Laven, Richard
    Parkinson, Tim
    Stafford, Kevin
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (09): : 1 - 19
  • [42] Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Does, Bucks, and Kit Rabbits Reared for Production
    Dalmau, Antoni
    Moles, Xenia
    Pallisera, Joaquim
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [43] Application of a welfare assessment protocol for Australian lot-fed cattle: The effect of time and frequency of assessment
    Taylor, Emily
    Dunston-Clarke, Emma
    Brookes, Daniel
    Jongman, Ellen
    Ling, Elysia
    Barnes, Anne
    Miller, David
    Fisher, Andrew
    Collins, Teresa
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2024, 277
  • [44] Non-animal welfare-conforming treatment of an umbilical hernia in a horse
    Mueller, F.
    Mueller, Ch.
    Fiedler, H. -H.
    Remmers, J.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE GROSSTIERE NUTZTIERE, 2008, 36 (06): : 413 - 416
  • [45] Testing an Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Growing-Rabbits Reared for Meat Production Based on the Welfare Quality Approach
    Botelho, Nadina
    Vieira-Pinto, Madalena
    Batchelli, Pau
    Pallisera, Joaquim
    Dalmau, Antoni
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (08): : 1 - 25
  • [46] Assessing dairy cow welfare at the beginning and end of the indoor period using the Welfare Quality® protocol
    de Graaf, S.
    Ampe, B.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2017, 26 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [47] Exercise as a welfare strategy? Insights from horse (Equus caballus) owners in the UK
    Naydani, Cynthia Joanne
    Coombs, Tamsin
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2025, 34
  • [48] Environmental and demographic risk factors for poor welfare in working horses, donkeys and mules in developing countries
    Burn, Charlotte C.
    Dennison, Tania L.
    Whay, Helen R.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2010, 186 (03) : 385 - 392
  • [49] Welfare assessment of horses: the AWIN approach
    Dalla Costa, E.
    Dai, F.
    Lebelt, D.
    Scholz, P.
    Barbieri, S.
    Canali, E.
    Zanella, A. J.
    Minero, M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [50] Welfare assessment in Italian pig slaughterhouses
    Di Martino, G.
    Zamprogna, S.
    Garbo, A.
    Caucci, C.
    Marchesan, M.
    Bonfanti, L.
    Dalmau, A.
    LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW, 2017, 23 (04): : 149 - 153