Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds

被引:42
作者
Walker, Kerry M. M. [1 ]
Schnupp, Jan W. H. [1 ,2 ]
Hart-Schnupp, Sheelah M. B. [1 ]
King, Andrew J. [1 ]
Bizley, Jennifer K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Physiol Anat & Genet, Oxford OX1 3PT, England
[2] Italian Inst Technol, Dept Robot Brain & Cognit Sci, I-16163 Genoa, Italy
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
FREQUENCY DIFFERENCE LIMENS; SPECTROTEMPORAL RECEPTIVE-FIELDS; AUDITORY-CORTEX; INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION; AMPLITUDE-MODULATION; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; PRIMITIVE MAMMALS; PERCEPTION; THRESHOLDS; ABSOLUTE;
D O I
10.1121/1.3179676
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Although many studies have examined the performance of animals in detecting a frequency change in a sequence of tones, few have measured animals' discrimination of the fundamental frequency (F0) of complex, naturalistic stimuli. Additionally, it is not yet clear if animals perceive the pitch of complex sounds along a continuous, low-to-high scale. Here, four ferrets (Mustela putorius) were trained on a two-alternative forced choice task to discriminate sounds that were higher or lower in F0 than a reference sound using pure tones and artificial vowels as stimuli. Average Weber fractions for ferrets on this task varied from similar to 20% to 80% across references (200-1200 Hz), and these fractions were similar for pure tones and vowels. These thresholds are approximately ten times higher than those typically reported for other mammals on frequency change detection tasks that use go/no-go designs. Naive human listeners outperformed ferrets on the present task, but they showed similar effects of stimulus type and reference F0. These results suggest that while non-human animals can be trained to label complex sounds as high or low in pitch, this task may be much more difficult for animals than simply detecting a frequency change. (c) 2009 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3179676]
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1335
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Poor frequency discrimination probes dyslexics with particularly impaired working memory [J].
Banai, K ;
Ahissar, M .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2004, 9 (06) :328-340
[2]   The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex [J].
Bendor, D ;
Wang, XQ .
NATURE, 2005, 436 (7054) :1161-1165
[3]   The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Effects of stimulus level [J].
Bernstein, Joshua G. W. ;
Oxenham, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 120 (06) :3916-3928
[4]   Role of auditory cortex in sound localization in the midsagittal plane [J].
Bizley, Jennifer K. ;
Nodal, Fernando R. ;
Parsons, Carl H. ;
King, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 98 (03) :1763-1774
[5]   Interdependent Encoding of Pitch, Timbre, and Spatial Location in Auditory Cortex [J].
Bizley, Jennifer K. ;
Walker, Kerry M. M. ;
Silverman, Bernard W. ;
King, Andrew J. ;
Schnupp, Jan W. H. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (07) :2064-2075
[6]   Macaque monkeys discriminate pitch relationships [J].
Brosch, M ;
Selezneva, E ;
Bucks, C ;
Scheich, H .
COGNITION, 2004, 91 (03) :259-272
[7]  
BURDICK C K, 1979, Journal of Auditory Research, V19, P59
[8]  
Burdick C.K., 1980, Journal of Auditory Research, V20, P1
[9]   The sound of one frog calling: The bullfrog's reactions to acoustic stimuli [J].
Simmons, Andrea Megela ;
Narins, Peter M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2022, 151 (03) :R5-R6
[10]   SIMILARITIES IN ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE PITCH PERCEPTION IN SONGBIRDS (STARLING AND ZEBRA FINCH) AND A NONSONGBIRD (PIGEON) [J].
CYNX, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 109 (03) :261-267