Engendering social and environmental safeguards in REDD plus : lessons from feminist and development research

被引：22

作者：

Bee, Beth A. ^{[1
]}

Basnett, Bimbika Sijapati ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] East Carolina Univ, Dept Geog Planning & Environm, Greenville, NC 27858 USA

[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor, Indonesia

来源：

THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY | 2017年 / 38卷 / 04期

关键词：

Gender and feminism; environmental policy; REDD; forest governance; climate change; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; EAST-AFRICA; GENDER; WOMEN; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; REFLECTIONS; MARRIAGE;

D O I：

10.1080/01436597.2016.1191342

中图分类号：

F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

Drawing on feminist and development literature, this paper suggests several important lessons and considerations for building equitable approaches to REDD+. Specifically, we illustrate the conceptual and practical significance of women's participation for achieving the goals of REDD+as well as the limits and opportunities for gendering participation in REDD+. We argue that the standing debates over how and in what context gender becomes instrumentalised, technicalised or institutionalised in development provide important cautionary tales for the implementation and reporting of REDD+safeguards. By doing so, this paper contributes to the growing literature on gender, development, natural resource management and REDD+.

引用

页码：787 / 804

页数：18

共 60 条

[51] The nature of gender: work, gender, and environment [J].

Nightingale, Andrea .

ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2006, 24 (02) :165-185

[52] Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal [J].

Nightingale, Andrea J. .

GEOFORUM, 2011, 42 (02) :153-162

[53]

Reed M.G., 2000, Gender, Place Culture, V7, P363, DOI DOI 10.1080/713668882

[54]

Rey D., 2013, A Guide for Consistent, Implementation of REDD+ Safeguards

[55] Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes [J].

Rocheleau, D ;

Edmunds, D .

WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 25 (08) :1351-1371

[56] Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox [J].

Sandbrook, Chris ;

Nelson, Fred ;

Adams, William M. ;

Agrawal, Arun .

ORYX, 2010, 44 (03) :330-334

[57] Is gender an important factor influencing user groups' property rights and forestry governance? Empirical analysis from East Africa and Latin America [J].

Sun, Y. ;

Mwangi, E. ;

Meinzen-Dick, R. .

INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2011, 13 (02) :205-219

[58] Advancing equity in community forestry: recognition of the poor matters [J].

Sunam, R. K. ;

McCarthy, J. F. .

INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2010, 12 (04) :370-382

[59] Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+ [J].

Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J. ;

McDermott, Constance ;

Vijge, Marjanneke J. ;

Cashore, Benjamin .

CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) :646-653

[60] Defining Solutions, Finding Problems: Deforestation, Gender, and REDD plus in Burkina Faso [J].

Westholm, Lisa ;

Arora-Jonsson, Seema .

CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2015, 13 (02) :189-199

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →