A high response is not essential to prevent selection bias: Results from the Leiden 85-plus study

被引:166
作者
Bootsma-van der Wiel, A [1 ]
van Exel, E [1 ]
de Craen, AJM [1 ]
Gussekloo, J [1 ]
Lagaay, AM [1 ]
Knook, DL [1 ]
Westendorp, RGJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
aged; 80 and over; cohort studies; epidemiologic methods; health; mortality; selection bias;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00505-X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We tested the hypothesis that an additional effort to increase the response rate would diminish selection bias in a community-based cohort study. In the Leiden 85-plus Study, all subjects of the town of Leiden who had reached their 85th birthday were informed of the study by mail and then asked to participate by telephone. In an additional recruitment stage, those subjects who did not participate directly were visited and personally asked to participate. When these subjects refused, some nonresponse questions were asked. In this way we collected data on the whole source population. Of 691 eligible elderly subjects, 511 subjects (74%) participated directly. Of those who did not participate directly, 88 subjects participated after the additional effort. The response rate increased from 74% to 87%. Compared to the 511 subjects who directly particpated, the 88 subjects who entered the sudy after the additional effort had poorer health and lower survival. The subjects who refused were more healthy and had poorer mood. The direct sample did not differ from the source population with respect to socio-demographics, health, and mortality. In conclusion, we showed that given a moderately high direct response the additional effort was effective in increasing the response rate, but was also selective and was not necessary to prevent selection bias. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1125
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3275, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3275::AID-SIM626>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-D
  • [3] RESPONSE BIAS IN THE HONOLULU HEART PROGRAM
    BENFANTE, R
    REED, D
    MACLEAN, C
    KAGAN, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (06) : 1088 - 1100
  • [4] MORTALITY AND CANCER RATES IN NONRESPONDENTS TO A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF OLDER WOMEN - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    BISGARD, KM
    FOLSOM, AR
    HONG, CP
    SELLERS, TA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (10) : 990 - 1000
  • [5] ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR ESTIMATING PREVALENCE IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEYS WITH 2 WAVES OF RESPONDENTS
    BRENNER, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (11) : 1236 - 1245
  • [6] SOCIAL DESIRABILITY AND THE MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN ELDERLY PERSONS
    CARSTENSEN, LL
    CONE, JD
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1983, 38 (06): : 713 - 715
  • [7] CORNONIHUNTLEY J, 1993, AGING-CLIN EXP RES, V5, P27
  • [8] THE-PAQUID-EPIDEMIOLOGIC-PROGRAM-ON-BRAIN-AGING
    DARTIGUES, JF
    GAGNON, M
    BARBERGERGATEAU, P
    LETENNEUR, L
    COMMENGES, D
    SAUVEL, C
    MICHEL, P
    SALAMON, R
    [J]. NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 11 : 14 - 18
  • [9] Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: The effect of differential inclusion in side studies
    Deeg, DJH
    van Tilburg, T
    Smit, JH
    de Leeuw, ED
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [10] The Gloucestershire longitudinal study of disability: Outcomes in nonresponders, responders, and subsequent defaulters
    Donald, IP
    Bulpitt, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) : 1305 - 1310