Hearing results after stapedotomy for otosclerosis: comparison of prosthesis variables

被引:8
作者
Odat, H. [1 ]
Kanaan, Y. [1 ]
Alali, M. [1 ]
Al-Qudah, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, King Abdullah Univ Hosp, Dept Special Surg, Div Otolaryngol, POB 3030, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
Otosclerosis; Stapes Surgery; Hearing; Audiometry; STAPES PROSTHESIS; PISTON DIAMETER; FENESTRA SIZE; TEFLON PISTON; SURGERY; STAPEDECTOMY; TITANIUM; MICRODRILL;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215120002595
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the influence of different piston variables on hearing following stapedotomy. Methods Data were analysed in groups according to: piston material (titanium vs fluoroplastic), shaft diameter (0.4 mm vs 0.5 mm) and crimping style (manual crimping vs self-crimping). Pre- and post-operative average air-bone gap, air-bone gap difference, success rate and operative time were evaluated. Results and conclusion Fifty-one patients (58 ears) were included. A post-operative air-bone gap of 10 dB or lower was achieved in 44 cases, with a success rate of 75.9 per cent; 52 cases (89.7 per cent) had an air-bone gap of 20 dB or lower. The success rate was higher, but not significantly, in fluoroplastic than in titanium pistons (85 per cent vs 70 per cent). Pistons with shaft diameters of 0.5 mm and 0.4 mm had success rates of 79 per cent and 72 per cent, respectively. No significant differences were found for any audiometric parameters. There were no significant differences between manual crimping and self-crimping pistons in terms of audiometric results or success rate.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 32
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V113, P186
[2]  
Casale M, 2003, Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), V124, P255
[3]   Stapedotomy: Functional Results with Different Diameter Prostheses [J].
Cavaliere, M. ;
Ricciardiello, F. ;
Mesolella, M. ;
Iengo, M. .
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 74 (02) :93-96
[4]   Stapedectomy Versus Stapedotomy [J].
Cheng, Horace C. S. ;
Agrawal, Sumit K. ;
Parnes, Lorne S. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 51 (02) :375-+
[5]  
Cureoglu S, 1989, AM J OTOLARYNG, V27, P334
[6]   Prevalence of otosclerosis in an unselected series of temporal bones [J].
Declau, F ;
Van Spaendonck, M ;
Timmermans, JP ;
Michaels, L ;
Liang, J ;
Qiu, JP ;
Van de Heyning, P .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (05) :596-602
[7]   Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of factors affecting outcome [J].
Dhooge, Ingeborg ;
Desmedt, Stephanie ;
Maly, Thomas ;
Loose, David ;
Van Hoecke, Helen .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 275 (05) :1111-1119
[8]  
Ealy M, 2011, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V70, P122, DOI 10.1159/000322488
[9]   MICRODRILL VERSUS PERFORATOR FOR STAPEDOTOMY [J].
GJURIC, M .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1990, 15 (05) :411-413
[10]  
GORDON MA, 1989, AM J OTOL, V10, P426