Computer-Aided Pulmonary Nodule Detection - Performance of Two CAD Systems at Different CT Dose Levels

被引:20
|
作者
Hein, P. A. [1 ]
Rogalla, P. [1 ]
Klessen, C. [1 ]
Lembcke, A. [1 ]
Romano, V. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Radiol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2009年 / 181卷 / 11期
关键词
thorax; neoplasms; CT spiral; computer-aided detection; radiation dose; EARLY LUNG-CANCER; SPIRAL CT; CHEST CT; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; AUTOMATED DETECTION; ASSISTED DETECTION; SCREENING-PROGRAM; MULTIDETECTOR CT; SLICE THICKNESS; BASE-LINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0028-1109394
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of dose reduction on the performance of computer-aided lung nodule detection systems (CAD) of two manufacturers by comparing respective CAD results on ultra-low-close computed tomography (ULD-CT) and standard dose CT (SD-CT). Materials and Methods: Multi-slice Computed tomography (MSCT) data sets of 26 patients (13 male and 13 female, patients 31 - 74 years old) were retrospectively selected for CAD analysis. Indication for CT examination was staging of a known primary malignancy or suspected pulmonary malignancy. CT images were consecutively acquired at 5 mAs (ULD-CT) and 75 mAs (SD-CT) with 120 kV tube voltage (I mm slice thickness). The standard of reference was determined by three experienced readers in consensus. CAD reading algorithms (pre-commercial CAD system, Philips, Netherlands: CAD-1; LungCARE, Siemens, Germany: CAD-2) were applied to the CT data sets. Results: Consensus reading identified 253 nodules on SD-CT and ULD-CT. Nodules ranged in diameter between 2 and 41 mm (mean diameter 4.8 mm). Detection rates were recorded with 72% and 62% (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2) for SD-CT and with 73% and 56% for ULD-CT. Median false positive rates per patient were calculated with 6 and 5 (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2) for SD-CT and with 8 and 3 for ULD-CT. After separate statistical analysis of nodules with diameters of 5 mm and greater, the detection rates increased to 83% and 61% for SD-CT and to 89% and 67% for ULD-CT (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2). For both CAD systems there were no significant differences between the detection rates for standard and ultra-low-dose data sets (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Dose reduction of the underlying CT scan did not significantly influence nodule detection performance of the tested CAD systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1064
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is there a safety-net effect with Computer-Aided Detection (CAD)?
    Du-Crow, Ethan
    Warren, Lucy
    Astley, Susan M.
    Hulleman, Johan
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 10952
  • [42] A Multistage Approach to Improve Performance of Computer-Aided Detection of Pulmonary Embolisms Depicted on CT Images: Preliminary Investigation
    Park, Sang Cheol
    Chapman, Brian E.
    Zheng, Bin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (06) : 1519 - 1527
  • [43] Reproducibility of prompts in computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer
    Taylor, CG
    Champness, J
    Reddy, M
    Taylor, P
    Potts, HWW
    Given-Wilson, R
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (09) : 733 - 738
  • [44] Combination of computer-aided detection algorithms for automatic lung nodule identification
    Camarlinghi, Niccolo
    Gori, Ilaria
    Retico, Alessandra
    Bellotti, Roberto
    Bosco, Paolo
    Cerello, Piergiorgio
    Gargano, Gianfranco
    Lopez Torres, Ernesto
    Megna, Rosario
    Peccarisi, Marco
    Fantacci, Maria Evelina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2012, 7 (03) : 455 - 464
  • [45] Combination of computer-aided detection algorithms for automatic lung nodule identification
    Niccolò Camarlinghi
    Ilaria Gori
    Alessandra Retico
    Roberto Bellotti
    Paolo Bosco
    Piergiorgio Cerello
    Gianfranco Gargano
    Ernesto Lopez Torres
    Rosario Megna
    Marco Peccarisi
    Maria Evelina Fantacci
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2012, 7 : 455 - 464
  • [46] Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems
    Petrick, Nicholas
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Armato, Samuel G., III
    Bert, Alberto
    Correale, Loredana
    Delsanto, Silvia
    Freedman, Matthew T.
    Fryd, David
    Gur, David
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Huo, Zhimin
    Jiang, Yulei
    Morra, Lia
    Paquerault, Sophie
    Raykar, Vikas
    Samuelson, Frank
    Summers, Ronald M.
    Tourassi, Georgia
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    Zheng, Bin
    Zhou, Chuan
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (08)
  • [47] Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: update 2007
    Bielen, Didier
    Kiss, Gabriel
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2007, 32 (05): : 571 - 581
  • [48] Computer-aided detection of polyps and masses for CT colonography
    Näppi, J
    Frimmel, H
    Dachman, A
    Yoshida, H
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 860 - 868
  • [49] CURRENT CONCEPTS IN COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION FOR CT COLONOGRAPHY
    Summers, Ronald M.
    2010 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, 2010, : 269 - 272
  • [50] Computer-aided detection for the automated evaluation of pulmonary embolism
    Li, Yan
    Dai, Yongliang
    Deng, Lei
    Yu, Nan
    Guo, Youmin
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2017, 25 : S135 - S142