Computer-Aided Pulmonary Nodule Detection - Performance of Two CAD Systems at Different CT Dose Levels

被引:20
|
作者
Hein, P. A. [1 ]
Rogalla, P. [1 ]
Klessen, C. [1 ]
Lembcke, A. [1 ]
Romano, V. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Radiol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2009年 / 181卷 / 11期
关键词
thorax; neoplasms; CT spiral; computer-aided detection; radiation dose; EARLY LUNG-CANCER; SPIRAL CT; CHEST CT; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; AUTOMATED DETECTION; ASSISTED DETECTION; SCREENING-PROGRAM; MULTIDETECTOR CT; SLICE THICKNESS; BASE-LINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0028-1109394
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of dose reduction on the performance of computer-aided lung nodule detection systems (CAD) of two manufacturers by comparing respective CAD results on ultra-low-close computed tomography (ULD-CT) and standard dose CT (SD-CT). Materials and Methods: Multi-slice Computed tomography (MSCT) data sets of 26 patients (13 male and 13 female, patients 31 - 74 years old) were retrospectively selected for CAD analysis. Indication for CT examination was staging of a known primary malignancy or suspected pulmonary malignancy. CT images were consecutively acquired at 5 mAs (ULD-CT) and 75 mAs (SD-CT) with 120 kV tube voltage (I mm slice thickness). The standard of reference was determined by three experienced readers in consensus. CAD reading algorithms (pre-commercial CAD system, Philips, Netherlands: CAD-1; LungCARE, Siemens, Germany: CAD-2) were applied to the CT data sets. Results: Consensus reading identified 253 nodules on SD-CT and ULD-CT. Nodules ranged in diameter between 2 and 41 mm (mean diameter 4.8 mm). Detection rates were recorded with 72% and 62% (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2) for SD-CT and with 73% and 56% for ULD-CT. Median false positive rates per patient were calculated with 6 and 5 (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2) for SD-CT and with 8 and 3 for ULD-CT. After separate statistical analysis of nodules with diameters of 5 mm and greater, the detection rates increased to 83% and 61% for SD-CT and to 89% and 67% for ULD-CT (CAD-1 vs. CAD-2). For both CAD systems there were no significant differences between the detection rates for standard and ultra-low-dose data sets (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Dose reduction of the underlying CT scan did not significantly influence nodule detection performance of the tested CAD systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1064
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Cancer: Combining Pulmonary Nodule Detection Systems with a Tumor Risk Prediction Model
    Seito, Arnaud A. A.
    Jacobs, Colin
    Ciompi, Francesco
    van Riel, Sarah J.
    Wille, Mathilde Marie Winker
    Dirksen, Asger
    van Rikxoort, Eva M.
    van Ginneken, Bram
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
  • [22] First Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation in Dual-Source Photon-Counting Detector CT at Different Low-Dose Levels
    Jungblut, Lisa
    Bluthgen, Christian
    Polacin, Malgorzata
    Messerli, Michael
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Euler, Andre
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Martini, Katharina
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2022, 57 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [23] Impact of Image Quality on the Performance of Computer-Aided Detection of Pulmonary Embolism
    Wittenberg, Rianne
    Peters, Joost F.
    Sonnemans, Jeroen J.
    Bipat, Shandra
    Prokop, Mathias
    Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [24] Malignant lesions on mammography: accuracy of two different computer-aided detection systems
    Lobbes, Marc
    Smidt, Marjolein
    Keymeulen, Kristien
    Girometti, Rossano
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Beets-Tan, Regina
    Wildberger, Joachim
    Boetes, Carla
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [25] Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism at CT pulmonary angiography: can it improve performance of inexperienced readers?
    Kevin N. Blackmon
    Charles Florin
    Luca Bogoni
    Joshua W. McCain
    James D. Koonce
    Heon Lee
    Gorka Bastarrika
    Christian Thilo
    Philip Costello
    Marcos Salganicoff
    U. Joseph Schoepf
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1214 - 1223
  • [26] Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism at CT pulmonary angiography: can it improve performance of inexperienced readers?
    Blackmon, Kevin N.
    Florin, Charles
    Bogoni, Luca
    McCain, Joshua W.
    Koonce, James D.
    Lee, Heon
    Bastarrika, Gorka
    Thilo, Christian
    Costello, Philip
    Salganicoff, Marcos
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 1214 - 1223
  • [27] Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance
    Justus E. Roos
    David Paik
    David Olsen
    Emily G. Liu
    Lawrence C. Chow
    Ann N. Leung
    Robert Mindelzun
    Kingshuk R. Choudhury
    David P. Naidich
    Sandy Napel
    Geoffrey D. Rubin
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 549 - 557
  • [28] Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance
    Roos, Justus E.
    Paik, David
    Olsen, David
    Liu, Emily G.
    Chow, Lawrence C.
    Leung, Ann N.
    Mindelzun, Robert
    Choudhury, Kingshuk R.
    Naidich, David P.
    Napel, Sandy
    Rubin, Geoffrey D.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 549 - 557
  • [29] Evaluation of a method of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at computed tomography
    Foti, G.
    Faccioli, N.
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Contro, A.
    Milazzo, T.
    Mucelli, R. Pozzi
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2010, 115 (06): : 950 - 961
  • [30] Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function
    Lo, ShihChung B.
    Freedman, Matthew T.
    Gillis, Laura B.
    White, Charles S.
    Mun, Seong K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) : 480 - 488