Prefraction displacement and intrafraction drift of the prostate due to perineal ultrasound probe pressure

被引:2
作者
Li, Minglun [1 ]
Hegemann, Nina-Sophie [1 ]
Manapov, Farkhad [1 ]
Kolberg, Anne [1 ]
Thum, Patrick Dominik [1 ]
Ganswindt, Ute [1 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ]
Ballhausen, Hendrik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Lindwurmstr 2a, D-80337 Munich, Germany
关键词
External beam radiotherapy; Transperineal ultrasound; Patient positioning; Intrafraction motion; Quality assurance; 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND; ENDORECTAL BALLOON; LOCALIZATION; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-017-1105-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective In image-guided EBRT of the prostate, transperineal ultrasound (US) probes exert pressure on the perineum both during planning and treatment. Through tissue deformation and relaxation, this causes target and risk organ displacement and drift. In this study, prefraction shift and intrafraction drift of the prostate are quantified during robotic transperineal 4DUS. Methods The position of the prostate was recorded for different positions of the probe before treatment in 10 patients (16 series of measurements). During treatment (15 patients, 273 fractions), intrafraction motion of the prostate was tracked (total of 27 h and 24 min) with the transperineal probe in place. Results Per 1 mm shift of the US probe in the cranial direction, a displacement of the prostate by 0.42 +/- 0.09 mm in the cranial direction was detected. The relationship was found to be linear (R-2 = 0.97) and highly significant (p < 0.0001). After initial contact of the probe and the perineum (no pressure), a shift of the probe of about 5-10 mm was typically necessary to achieve good image quality, corresponding to a shift of the prostate of about 2-4 mm in the cranial direction. Tissue compression and prostate displacement were well visible. During treatment, the prostate drifted at an average rate of 0.075 mm/min in the cranial direction (p = 0.0014). Conclusion The pressure applied by a perineal US probe has a quantitatively similar impact on prostate displacement as transabdominal pressure. Shifts are predominantly in the cranial direction (typically 2-4 mm) with some component in the anterior direction (typically < 1 mm). Slight probe pressure can improve image quality, but excessive probe pressure can distort the surrounding anatomy and potentially move risk organs closer to the high-dose area.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Surface refraction of sound waves affects calibration of three-dimensional ultrasound [J].
Ballhausen, Hendrik ;
Ballhausen, Bianca Desiree ;
Lachaine, Martin ;
Li, Minglun ;
Parodi, Katia ;
Belka, Claus ;
Reiner, Michael .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
[2]  
Ballhausen H, 2015, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V191, P442, DOI 10.1007/s00066-015-0811-9
[3]   Technical Note: Millimeter precision in ultrasound based patient positioning: Experimental quantification of inherent technical limitations [J].
Ballhausen, Hendrik ;
Hieber, Sheila ;
Li, Minglun ;
Belka, Claus ;
Reiner, Michael .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) :212-215
[4]   Evaluation of possible prostate displacement induced by pressure applied during transabdominal ultrasound image acquisition [J].
Dobler, B ;
Mai, S ;
Ross, C ;
Wolff, D ;
Wertz, H ;
Lohr, F ;
Wenz, F .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 (04) :240-246
[5]   Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy [J].
Fargier-Voiron, Marie ;
Presles, Benoit ;
Pommier, Pascal ;
Rit, Simon ;
Munoz, Alexandre ;
Liebgott, Herve ;
Sarrut, David ;
Biston, Marie-Claude .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (01) :132-137
[6]   Evaluation of a three-dimensional ultrasound localisation system incorporating probe pressure correction for use in partial breast irradiation [J].
Harris, E. J. ;
Symonds-Taylor, R. ;
Treece, G. M. ;
Gee, A. H. ;
Prager, R. W. ;
Brabants, P. ;
Evans, P. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (982) :839-846
[7]  
Lachaine M., 2013, Medical Physics International Journal, V1, P72, DOI DOI 10.1053/J.SEMRADONC.2003.10.003
[8]   A comparative assessment of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional ultrasound and cone beam CT [J].
Li, Minglun ;
Ballhausen, Hendrik ;
Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Ganswindt, Ute ;
Manapov, Farkhad ;
Tritschler, Stefan ;
Roosen, Alexander ;
Gratzke, Christian ;
Reiner, Michael ;
Belka, Claus .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
[9]   Ultrasound probe pressure as a source of error in prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy [J].
McGahan, JP ;
Ryu, J ;
Fogata, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (03) :788-793
[10]   An Endorectal Balloon Reduces Intrafraction Prostate Motion During Radiotherapy [J].
Smeenk, Robert Jan ;
Louwe, Robert J. W. ;
Langen, Katja M. ;
Shah, Amish P. ;
Kupelian, Patrick A. ;
van Lin, Emile N. J. Th. ;
Kaanders, Johannes H. A. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02) :661-669