A comparative critical metaphor analysis on the concept of democracy in Turkish and American English

被引:4
作者
Bas, Melike [1 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept English Language Teaching, Amasya, Turkey
来源
REVIEW OF COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS | 2020年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
critical metaphor analysis; democracy; Turkish; American English; corpus;
D O I
10.1075/rcl.00073.bas
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This corpus-based study concentrates on the metaphorical conceptualizations of the concept of 'democracy' in Turkish and American English to find out how this socio-political term is conceptually represented in the minds of Turkish and American speakers. The database consists of 4000 concordance lines that were extracted from four different corpora: TNCv3.0, TS Columns, COCA, and NOW. Critical Metaphor Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2004) and MIP (Pragglejaz, 2007) were employed in the identification, explanation and interpretation of metaphors. Findings indicate various linguistic metaphors that can be grouped under several source domain categories including PHYSICAL OBJECT, CONFLICT and LIVING ORGANISM as the most frequent ones. The most widespread metaphor in Turkish is DEMOCRACY IS A DESTINATION, whereas it is DEMOCRACY IS WAR in American English, embodying two different worldviews. The study proposes that the way the concept of democracy is composed has a role in manipulating people's perception of the type of a democracy they are ruled by.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 566
页数:32
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aksan Y, 2012, LREC 2012 - EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, P3223
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, METAPHOR PRACTICAL I
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Washingthe Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, DOI DOI 10.1075/DAPSAC.23
[4]  
Charteris-Black J., 2018, ANAL POLITICAL SPEEC, V2nd
[5]   Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign [J].
Charteris-Black, Jonathan .
DISCOURSE & SOCIETY, 2006, 17 (05) :563-581
[6]  
CharterisBlack J, 2004, CORPUS APPROACHES TO CRITICAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230000612
[7]  
CharterisBlack J, 2005, POLITICIANS AND RHETORIC: THE PERSUASIVE POWER OF METAPHOR, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230501706
[8]  
Crick Bernard., 2002, Democracy: A Very Short Introduction
[9]  
Crisp P, 2007, METAPHOR SYMBOL, V22, P1
[10]  
Dahl RabetA., 1989, DEMOCRACY ITS CRITIC