Towards adaptive coastal management: Lessons from a "legal storm" in Byron Shire, Australia

被引:16
作者
Frohlich, Miguel F. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Timothy F. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Jacobson, Chris [1 ]
Fidelman, Pedro [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Carter, R. W. [1 ]
Baldwin, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sustainabil Res Ctr, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[2] Saes Advogados, Av Rio Branco 4,Sala 1104, BR-20090000 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[4] Uppsala Univ, SWEDESD, Campus Gotland, SE-62167 Visby, Sweden
[5] Univ Queensland, Ctr Policy Futures, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[6] Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7004, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Adaptive governance; Adaptive management; Law; Managed realignment; Path dependency; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; DECISION-MAKING TRIGGERS; FLEURIEU PENINSULA; PLANNED RETREAT; POLICY; ZONE; RISK; LAW; STATIONARITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104909
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Adaptive management has been advocated as an appropriate approach for the management of social-ecological systems, although its implementation has proven to be a challenge. Legal systems can hinder or facilitate adaptive management. Focusing on legal arrangements, this article explores how adaptive management can be better operationalised in the context of coastal management. Byron Shire, a local government area in New South Wales, Australia, was selected as a case study where we: (a) analysed how the concept of adaptive management has emerged within the evolution of coastal management and its applicable legal framework, and (b) identified juridical constraints to adaptive coastal management. Qualitative methods were used for the analysis of relevant documents and semi-structured interviews with 23 key informants. The results show that a distorted version of adaptive management has been adopted in Byron Shire's draft coastal management plans, which fails to adhere to the formal, structured, and iterative process of adaptive management. A legacy created by the legal effects of past decisions affecting coastal management has led to a path dependency towards protective measures to manage coastal erosion, constraining other management options, particularly managed realignment strategies. Failure to address juridical constraints in the early stages of the adaptive management process can result in stakeholder conflict and litigation. Overlitigation harms adaptive coastal management by pushing the decision-making process away from the pathway offered by the legal framework for preparing and implementing coastal management plans. After recent legislative coastal reform at the state level, there is momentum for the Byron Shire Council to refocus its adaptive management approach. However, overcoming existing juridical constraints will require adaptive governance, in which all levels of government must work collaboratively with the affected stakeholders in the design and implementation of the adaptive management process.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Adaptive management for a turbulent future
    Allen, Craig R.
    Fontaine, Joseph J.
    Pope, Kevin L.
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (05) : 1339 - 1345
  • [2] Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management
    Allen, Craig R.
    Gunderson, Lance H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (05) : 1379 - 1384
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, INTEGRATED COASTAL M
  • [4] [Anonymous], BYR SHIR COUNC ORD M
  • [5] [Anonymous], COMP COAST ENG ASP S
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE COAST
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, COAST ZON MAN PLAN B
  • [8] [Anonymous], DRAFT COAST ZON MAN
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, Journal of Law, Economics & Policy.
  • [10] [Anonymous], BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL