Evaluation of commercial and field-expedient baited traps for house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

被引:1
作者
Geden, Christopher J. [1 ]
Szumlas, Daniel E. [2 ]
Walker, Todd W. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Ctr Med Agr & Vet Entomol, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[2] USN, Navy Entomol Ctr Excellence, Air Stn, Jacksonville, FL 32212 USA
关键词
House fly; Musca domestica; trapping; CHEMICAL ATTRACTANTS; FLY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1948-7134.2009.00012.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
A comparison of nine commercial baited fly traps on Florida dairy farms demonstrated that Terminator traps collected significantly more (13,323/trap) house flies (Musca domestica L.) than the others tested. Final Flight, Fly Magnet, and FliesBeGone traps collected intermediate numbers of flies (834-2,166), and relatively few were caught with ISCA, Advantage, Fermone Big Boy, Squeeze & Snap, or OakStump traps (<300). Terminator traps collected about twice as many flies (799.8/trap) as FliesBeGone traps (343.8) when each trap was baited with its respective attractant, but when the attractants were switched between the two trap types, collections were significantly lower (77-108) than was observed with traps baited with their respective attractant. Solutions of molasses were significantly more attractive to house flies than honey, maple syrup, or jaggery (date palm sugar). Field-expedient traps constructed from discarded PET water bottles were much less effective than commercial traps, but painting the tops of such traps with black spray paint resulted in a six-fold increase in trap capture. Journal of Vector Ecology 34 (1): 99-103. 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 103
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条