Influence of Menstrual Cycle Timing on Screening Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Diagnostic Performance in Premenopausal Women

被引:32
作者
Dontchos, Brian N. [1 ]
Rahbar, Habib [2 ]
Partridge, Savannah C. [2 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
DeMartini, Wendy B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle Canc Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford Comprehens Canc Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast; MRI; menstrual cycle; background parenchymal enhancement; BPE;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbz022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the influence of menstrual cycle timing on background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and performance on screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in premenopausal women at high risk for developing breast cancer. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, all screening breast MRIs performed from January 2007 through November 2010 in premenopausal women in whom day from last menstrual period was recorded were identified. Prospectively recorded BPE levels and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System MRI assessments were extracted from our database. Subject outcomes were determined by using biopsy, imaging follow-up, and linkage with the regional tumor registry (minimum 12-month follow-up). Associations of BPE levels (minimal/mild versus moderate/marked) with menstrual cycle phase (follicular [day 0-15] versus luteal [day 16-35]) and week (1, 2, 3, or 4) were compared. Differences in MRI performance metrics, including abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), positive biopsy rate (PBR), cancer yield, sensitivity, and specificity, were compared between menstrual cycle phase and menstrual cycle week. Results: Three-hundred twenty examinations in 244 premenopausal women met inclusion criteria with nine cancers diagnosed. BPE levels were not associated with menstrual cycle phase or week (P > 0.05). MRI performance metrics (ie, AIR, PBR, cancer yield, sensitivity, or specificity) did not differ significantly based on menstrual cycle phase or menstrual cycle week (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Obtaining screening breast MRI exams during specific phases or weeks of the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women does not reliably produce MRI examinations with lower BPE levels or improved performance.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 211
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Kinetic Properties of Background Parenchymal Enhancement throughout the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle [J].
Amarosa, Alana R. ;
McKellop, Jason ;
Leite, Ana Paula Klautau ;
Moccaldi, Melanie ;
Clendenen, Tess V. ;
Babb, James S. ;
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne ;
Moy, Linda ;
Kim, Sungheon .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (02) :356-365
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, AM COLL RAD ACR BREA
[3]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[4]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[5]   Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: Perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) :236-241
[6]   Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: Breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging - Initial observations [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Halpern, EF ;
Kopans, DB .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (01) :36-41
[7]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Impact on Diagnostic Performance [J].
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Liu, Franklin ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Gutierrez, Robert L. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) :W373-W380
[8]   Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk? [J].
Dontchos, Brian N. ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Korde, Larissa A. ;
Lam, Diana L. ;
Scheel, John R. ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) :371-380
[9]   Patterns of Nonmasslike Enhancement at Screening Breast MR Imaging of High-Risk Premenopausal Women [J].
Giess, Catherine S. ;
Raza, Sughra ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (05) :1343-1360
[10]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Baseline Screening Breast MRI: Impact on Biopsy Rate and Short-Interval Follow-Up [J].
Hambly, Niamh M. ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Brennan, Sandra ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) :218-224