A Study on the Improvement of the Evaluation Scale of Discomfort Glare in Educational Facilities

被引:11
作者
Lee, Sewon [1 ]
Lee, Kyung Sun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hongik Univ, Res Inst Sci & Technol, Seoul 04066, South Korea
[2] Hongik Univ, Sch Architecture, Seoul 04066, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
educational facilities; environmental certification; discomfort glare; daylight glare probability; DIVA for Rhino-Grasshopper; discomfort glare occurrence frequency; MODEL; VALIDATION; DESIGN; OFFICE; VIEW;
D O I
10.3390/en12173265
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The lighting environment is a factor that significantly affects the physical and psychological aspects of occupants of a building. In particular, educational facilities should be designed to provide adequate natural lighting because it has a profound impact on students' health and learning performance. Although environmental certification systems include evaluation items for improving the indoor light environment, there is a lack of evaluation criteria regarding the corresponding issue of glare. Therefore, this study aims to help visualize areas where indoor glare problems occur, and to improve the evaluation scale of discomfort glare in environmental certification systems. A standard high school classroom in Seoul was analyzed to study glare issues in the educational space. DIVA for Rhino-Grasshopper, a light environment simulation program based on Radiance and DAYSIM program, was used to obtain reliable light analysis simulation results, and the daylight glare probability (DGP) measure was used to calculate discomfort glare. The results of the simulation and analysis suggest this is a method for improving glare evaluation measures that are lacking in indoor environmental certification standards. The visualized frequency of discomfort glare data is useful for planning the layout of the indoor space, opening, and shading design of a building to prevent glare problems.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DAYLIGHT SIMULATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, THESIS
[4]  
Bechthold M., 2011, P 28 INT S AUT ROB C, P70
[5]  
Bellia L., 2008, P VIS QUAL EN EFF IN
[6]   Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity [J].
Cantin, F. ;
Dubois, M-C .
LIGHTING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 43 (03) :291-307
[7]   A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design [J].
Carlucci, Salvatore ;
Causone, Francesco ;
De Rosa, Francesco ;
Pagliano, Lorenzo .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 47 :1016-1033
[8]  
Chauvel P., 1982, LIGHTING RES TECHNOL, V14, P31
[9]   Spectral design and evaluation of OLEDs as light sources [J].
Chen, Li-Yin ;
Chen, Shi-hua ;
Dai, Shih-Jie ;
Kuo, Chie-Tong ;
Wang, Hsiang-Chen .
ORGANIC ELECTRONICS, 2014, 15 (10) :2194-2209
[10]   Anti-glare LED lamps with adjustable illumination light field [J].
Chen, Yung-Sheng ;
Lin, Chung-Yi ;
Yeh, Chun-Ming ;
Kuo, Chie-Tong ;
Hsu, Chih-Wei ;
Wang, Hsiang-Chen .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2014, 22 (05) :5183-5195