Career Stereotypes and Identities: Implicit Beliefs and Major Choice for College Women and Men in STEM and Female-Dominated Fields

被引:23
作者
Dunlap, Sarah T. [1 ]
Barth, Joan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Inst Social Sci Res, Box 870216, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sex roles; Couples; Implicit; Stereotyped attitudes; Identity; Academic specialization (major); Gender roles; Romantic relationships; STEM majors; SEX-DIFFERENCES; MATH; SCIENCE; ATTITUDES; CONNECTEDNESS; COMMITMENT; INSURANCE; PURSUIT; PEOPLE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11199-019-1013-1
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The present study examines the gendered nature of implicitly held beliefs related to STEM careers. It tests predictions from balanced identity theory on the relations between implicit STEM gender stereotypes and implicit STEM identity, as well as predictions from the associative-propositional model related to exposure to counter-stereotypical exemplars in a sample of U.S. college-aged heterosexual romantic couples that varied in whether the woman majored in STEM or in female-dominated majors (FDM). Gender-STEM stereotypes and Self-STEM identification, as measured by Implicit Associations Tasks, were examined in 117 college women majoring in STEM or in FDM and in their romantic partners, some of whom were also majoring in STEM. Women in STEM majors evidenced stronger STEM identities while also demonstrating reduced Gender/STEM stereotypes in comparison to women in FDM and men in STEM. For women, implicit STEM stereotypes predicted implicit STEM identity which in turn predicted majoring in STEM, consistent with predictions from balanced identity theory. There was no support for the hypothesis that men's exposure to counter-stereotypical women through their romantic relationships influenced their own implicit stereotypes, inconsistent with the associative-propositional model. Women in STEM fields and their romantic partners also evidenced more similar levels of STEM gender stereotypes when compared to the other couples. Dissemination of these results may encourage other STEM-talented women in similar pursuits.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 560
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Sequence-Based Classification of Select Agents: A Brighter Line, DOI [DOI 10.17226/12970, 10.17226/12970.]
  • [2] The Influence of Romantic Partners on Women in STEM Majors
    Barth, Joan M.
    Dunlap, Sarah
    Chappetta, Kelsey
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2016, 75 (3-4) : 110 - 125
  • [3] Women's Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations
    Ceci, Stephen J.
    Williams, Wendy M.
    Barnett, Susan M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (02) : 218 - 261
  • [4] Corbett C., 2015, SOLVING EQUATION VAR
  • [5] Do gender-science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors?
    Cundiff, Jessica L.
    Vescio, Theresa K.
    Loken, Eric
    Lo, Lawrence
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2013, 16 (04) : 541 - 554
  • [6] A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps
    Diekman, Amanda B.
    Steinberg, Mia
    Brown, Elizabeth R.
    Belanger, Aimee L.
    Clark, Emily K.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 21 (02) : 142 - 175
  • [7] Navigating Social Roles in Pursuit of Important Goals: A Communal Goal Congruity Account of STEM Pursuits
    Diekman, Amanda B.
    Steinberg, Mia
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2013, 7 (07): : 487 - 501
  • [8] Gender Roles in the Romantic Relationships of Women in STEM and Female-Dominated Majors: A Study of Heterosexual Couples
    Dunlap, Sarah T.
    Barth, Joan M.
    Chappetta, Kelsey
    [J]. GENDER ISSUES, 2019, 36 (02) : 113 - 135
  • [9] Eagly A.H., 1987, JOHN M MACEACHRAN ME, DOI DOI 10.4324/
  • [10] Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change
    Gawronski, Bertram
    Bodenhausen, Galen V.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (05) : 692 - 731