Modeling the practical effects of applicant reactions: Subgroup differences, in test-taking motivation, test performance, and selection rates

被引:9
作者
Ployhart, RE [1 ]
Ehrhart, MG
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2389.00216
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research suggests that Black-White differences in test-taking motivation may be related to subgroup test score differences, but this research has not shown the extent to which minimizing subgroup motivation differences will reduce subgroup differences in selection rates and adverse impact. This Monte Carlo study examined how enhancing Blacks' test-taking motivation for cognitive ability tests might reduce adverse impact across a range of (a) subgroup test differences, (b) selection ratios, (c) subgroup differences in test-taking motivation, and (d) relationships between motivation and test scores. The results suggest that although enhancing test-taking motivation will consistently reduce subgroup differences in test performance and adverse impact, the effect is often small and, will not eliminate adverse impact for any condition we examine. However, under some conditions the reduction may be important, and the discussion considers conditions where even these minimal reductions may be practically helpful.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 270
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Federal Register, V43, P38290
[2]   MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING [J].
ARVEY, RD ;
STRICKLAND, W ;
DRAUDEN, G ;
MARTIN, C .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 43 (04) :695-716
[3]   Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance [J].
Bobko, P ;
Roth, PL ;
Potosky, D .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (03) :561-589
[4]   Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) :311-320
[5]   Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
Sacco, JM ;
DeShon, RP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :471-485
[6]   Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :143-159
[7]   Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
DeShon, RP ;
Clause, CS ;
Delbridge, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) :300-310
[8]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[9]  
Cronbach L.J., 1970, ESSENTIAL PSYCHOL TE
[10]   VALIDITY AND UTILITY OF ALTERNATIVE PREDICTORS OF JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].
HUNTER, JE ;
HUNTER, RF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 96 (01) :72-98