Opportunity management of the COVID-19 pandemic: testing the crisis from a global perspective

被引:28
作者
Kuhlmann, Sabine [1 ]
Bouckaert, Geert [2 ]
Galli, Davide [4 ]
Reiter, Renate [5 ]
Van Hecke, Steven [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Publ Adm & Org, Potsdam, Germany
[2] KU Leuven Publ Governance Inst, Publ Management, Leuven, Belgium
[3] KU Leuven Publ Governance Inst, Comparat & EU Polit, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Management, Milan, Italy
[5] Fernuniv, Dept Polit Sci, Hagen, Germany
关键词
administrative culture; comparison; COVID-19; crisis management; governance; opportunity management; pandemic; window of opportunity;
D O I
10.1177/0020852321992102
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article provides a conceptual framework for the analysis of COVID-19 crisis governance in the first half of 2020 from a cross-country comparative perspective. It focuses on the issue of opportunity management, that is, how the crisis was used by relevant actors of distinctly different administrative cultures as a window of opportunity. We started from an overall interest in the factors that have influenced the national politics of crisis management to answer the question of whether and how political and administrative actors in various countries have used the crisis as an opportunity to facilitate, accelerate or prevent changes in institutional settings. The objective is to study the institutional settings and governance structures, (alleged) solutions and remedies, and constellations of actors and preferences that have influenced the mode of crisis and opportunity management. Finally, the article summarizes some major comparative findings drawn from the country studies of this Special Issue, focusing on similarities and differences in crisis responses and patterns of opportunity management. Points for practitioners With crises emerging in ever shorter sequences of time, governing turbulence and using crises for strategic institutional decisions has become an increasingly important issue for policymakers. Aiming at effective and proportionate responses, policymakers must take the institutional conditions, administrative traditions and relevant actor constellations of crisis management into account, which are key to learn from other countries' experiences. Comparing these experiences and analyzing the politics of crisis governance from a cross-country perspective may help policymakers to identify strengths and weaknesses of their own national/regional approaches and to seize crisis-related windows of opportunity for institutional reforms at the national and international levels.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 517
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]  
Ganghof Steffen., 2003, SWISS POLIT SCI REV, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.1662-6370.2003.TB00411.X
[22]  
Georgieva, 2020, COMMUNICATION 0519
[23]   Dismantling the "developmental state" administrative procedure reform in Japan and Korea [J].
Ginsburg, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2001, 49 (04) :585-625
[24]   Political science and the three new institutionalisms [J].
Hall, PA ;
Taylor, RCR .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1996, 44 (05) :936-957
[25]   A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS [J].
HOOD, C .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1991, 69 (01) :3-19
[26]   BLAME AVOIDANCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: REACTIVITY, STAGED RETREAT AND EFFICACY [J].
Hood, Christopher ;
Jennings, Will ;
Copeland, Paul .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (02) :542-562
[27]  
Immergut Ellen., 1992, HLTH CARE POLICIES I
[28]  
John Peter., 2001, LOCAL GOVERNANCE W E
[29]  
Kalbassi C., 2016, J RISK ANAL CRISIS R, V6, P110
[30]  
Kingdon J. W., 1984, Agendas, alternatives and public policies