Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients

被引:12
|
作者
Tabibi, Sonia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kegel, Andrea [2 ,3 ]
Lai, Wai Kong [4 ]
Bruce, Ian C. [5 ]
Dillier, Norbert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp, Lab Expt Audiol, ENT Dept, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] RIDBC, Sydney Cochlear Implant Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Electrically evoked compound action potential; Neural response telemetry; Recovery; Facilitation; Cochlear implant; RECOVERY FUNCTION; TELEMETRY; STIMULATION; MODEL; REFRACTORINESS; NEUROPATHY; CHILDREN; MASKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2019.07.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) refractoriness and facilitation can be quantified in electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded via neural response telemetry (NRT). Although facilitation has been observed in animals and human cochlear implant (CI) recipients, no study has modeled this in human CI users until now. In this study, recovery and facilitation effects at different masker and probe levels for three test electrodes (E6, E12 and E18) in 11 CI subjects were recorded. The ECAP recovery and facilitation were modeled by exponential functions and the same function used for +10 CL masker offset condition can be applied to all other masker offsets measurements. Goodness of fit was evaluated for the exponential functions. A significant effect of probe level was observed on a recovery time constant which highlights the importance of recording the recovery function at the maximum acceptable stimulus level. Facilitation time constant and amplitude showed no dependency on the probe level. However, facilitation was stronger for masker level at or around the threshold of the ECAP (T-ECAP). There was a positive correlation between facilitation magnitude and amplitude growth function (AGF) slope, which indicates that CI subjects with better peripheral neural survival have stronger facilitation. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users
    Azadpour, Mahan
    Shapiro, William H.
    Roland, J. Thomas, Jr.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 401
  • [32] Modeled auditory nerve responses to amplitude modulated cochlear implant stimulation
    van Gendt, M. J.
    Briaire, J. J.
    Kalkman, R. K.
    Frijns, J. H. M.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 351 : 19 - 33
  • [33] Postoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Association to Audiometric Thresholds and Auditory Performance
    Attias, Joseph
    Ulanovski, David
    Hilly, Ohad
    Greenstein, Tally
    Sokolov, Merav
    HabibAllah, Suhail
    Mormer, Hen
    Raveh, Eyal
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (05) : 1135 - 1143
  • [34] Auditory Temporal Acuity Probed With Cochlear Implant Stimulation and Cortical Recording
    Kirby, Alana E.
    Middlebrooks, John C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 103 (01) : 531 - 542
  • [35] Electrically evoked auditory steady state response detection in cochlear implant recipients using a system identification approach
    Schott, Julian
    Gransier, Robin
    Wouters, Jan
    Moonen, Marc
    2022 30TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO 2022), 2022, : 1243 - 1247
  • [36] ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients
    Schrank, Leonhard
    Nachtigaeller, Pascal
    Mueller, Joachim
    Hempel, John-Martin
    Canis, Martin
    Spiegel, Jennifer L.
    Rader, Tobias
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (07) : 3461 - 3473
  • [37] Auditory steady-state response in cochlear implant patients
    Torres-Fortuny, Alejandro
    Arnaiz-Marquez, Isabel
    Hernandez-Perez, Heivet
    Eimil-Suarez, Eduardo
    ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2018, 69 (05): : 268 - 274
  • [38] Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Attias, Joseph
    Greenstein, Tally
    Peled, Miriam
    Ulanovski, David
    Wohlgelernter, Jay
    Raveh, Eyal
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (02) : 184 - 193
  • [39] The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency
    He, Shuman
    McFayden, Tyler C.
    Shahsavarani, Bahar S.
    Teagle, Holly F. B.
    Ewend, Matthew
    Henderson, Lillian
    Buchman, Craig A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (03) : 482 - 494
  • [40] Performing MRI Scans on Cochlear Implant and Auditory Brainstem Implant Recipients: Review of 14.5 Years Experience
    Tam, Yu Chuen
    Lee, Jennifer W. Y.
    Gair, Juliette
    Jackson, Cay
    Donnelly, Neil P.
    Tysome, James R.
    Axon, Patrick R.
    Bance, Manohar L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (05) : E556 - E562