Report on the APMP.PR-S6: 2012-2013 supplementary comparison of spectral radiance from 250 nm to 2500 nm

被引：2

作者：

Shin, Dong-Joo ^{[1
]}

Park, Seongchong ^{[1
]}

Lee, Dong-Hoon ^{[1
]}

Dai Caihong ^{[2
]}

Wu Zhifeng ^{[2
]}

Wang Yanfei ^{[2
]}

Khlevnoy, Boris ^{[3
]}

Solodilov, Maxim ^{[3
]}

Kolesnikova, Svetlana ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] KRISS, 267 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34113, South Korea

[2] NIM, 18 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China

[3] VNIIOFI, Ozernaya 46, Moscow 119361, Russia

来源：

METROLOGIA | 2020年 / 57卷 / 1A期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/02001

中图分类号：

TH7 [仪器、仪表];

学科分类号：

0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;

摘要：

Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), National Institute of Metrology (NIM), and All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI) started an international comparison on the spectral radiance over the spectral region from 250 nm to 2500 nm in 2012 and completed all measurements in 2016. The aim of this comparison was to assess the equivalence of the spectral radiance scales between the three laboratories. This comparison was carried out according to the technical protocol listed in the KCDB under the identifier APMP.PR-S6. The difference from the reference value (RV) and its uncertainty of each participant of this comparison were calculated by using the relative difference model recommended by the Guidelines for CCPR Comparison Report Preparation. A method (ratio method) to calculate the difference from the RV and its uncertainty was proposed to eliminate the pilot effects involved in the relative difference model. In the ratio method, spectral radiance ratios to the pilot and geometric means were used to calculate the difference from the RV and its uncertainty of each participant. Results of this comparison analyzed using the ratio method showed that differences from the RV of all participants were within their uncertainties (k = 2) except a few wavelengths for each participant. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). © 2020 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.

引用

页数：3

共 16 条

[1] (2013)
[2] Khlevnoy B.B., Et al., Ccpr-s1supplementary comparison for spectral radiance in the range of 220 nm to 2500 nm, Metrologia, 46, pp. S174-S180, (2009)
[3] Woolliams E.R., Fox N.P., Cox M.G., Harris P.M., Harrison N.J., Final report on ccpr k1-A: Spectral irradiance from 250 nm to 2500 nm, Metrologia, 43, (2006)
[4] Park S.N., Park C.W., Lee D.H., Kim B.H., Consistency of the temperature scales above the silver freezing point realized at four different spectral bands, SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, (2006)
[5] Preston-Thomas H., The international scale of 1990 (its-90, Metrologia, 27, pp. 3-10, (1990)
[6] Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM).
[7] Dai C.-H., Wu Z.-F., Yu J.-L., Realization of the new national primary scale of spectral radiance and spectral irradiance, Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 8910, (2013)
[8] Dai C.-H., Wu Z.-F., Wang Y.-F., Spectral radiance characterization and realization based on high temperature blackbody bb3500m, Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 9795, (2015)
[9] Ogarev S.A., Khlevnoy B.B., Samoylov M.L., Shapoval V.I., Sapritsky V.I., Proceedings of TEMPMEKO 2004, 9th International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science, pp. 569-574, (2004)
[10] Samoylov M., Ogarev S., Khlevnoy B., Khromchenko V., Mekhontsev S., Sapritsky V., High accuracy radiation tsp-Type thermometers for radiometric scale realization in the temperature range from 600 to 3200 oc, AIP Conference Proceedings, 684, pp. 583-588, (2003)

← 1 2 →