The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?

被引:19
作者
Verep, Samed [1 ]
Erdem, Selcuk [1 ]
Ozluk, Yasemin [2 ]
Kilicaslan, Isin [2 ]
Sanli, Oner [1 ]
Ozcan, Faruk [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Urol, Istanbul Fac Med, Surg Monoblock,Floor 1, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Pathol, Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
active surveillance; gleason upgrading; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; GLEASON SCORES; BIOPSY; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Active surveillance (AS) is one of the treatment alternatives in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RP) were investigated in patients who were eligible for AS in the present study. Methods Between August 2006 and July 2017, 627 patients underwent RP in our institution. One hundred and thirty-six patients who were eligible for AS at the time of RP were included in this study. The previously defined AS criteria Gleason 3 + 3=6 adenocarcinoma at maximum two biopsy cores, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL and clinical T stage <= 2a were used in the study. The demographics, clinical, and histopathological outcomes were retrospectively compared between two groups, which were divided in accordance with the upgrading status at final pathology as Group 1 (n = 67, upgrading) and Group 2 (n = 69, nonupgrading). Results Gleason upgrading (GU) was found in 67 (49.3%) patients, and 17 patients (12.5%) were upstaged to pT3a. The upgrading to Gleason 3 + 4 was reported in 38.7% of patients, however, 7.4%, and 3.7% of the patients were upgraded to Gleason 4 + 3, and Gleason 4 + 4, respectively. The 10.3% of the patients had extraprostatic involvement, and the rate (19.4% vs 1.4%, P = .002) was significantly higher in Group 1. PSA density (P = .001), tumor size (P < .001), tumor percentage (P < .001), apical involvement (P = .013), and perineural invasion (P < .001) in RP specimen were higher in Group 1. Multivariate analysis showed that perineural invasion (OR = 4.26; 95%CI: 1.76-10.33; P = .001) and pathologic T stage (OR = 5.45; 95%CI: 1.08-27.4; P = .04) were independently associated with GU. Conclusions Since 12.5% of the patients upstaged to pT3a disease, and there is a possible risk of Gleason 4 pattern, upgrading of the tumor should carefully be kept in mind before offering AS to low-risk patients with PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1529
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Prostate cancer
    Attard, Gerhardt
    Parker, Chris
    Eeles, Ros A.
    Schroder, Fritz
    Tomlins, Scott A.
    Tannock, Ian
    Drake, Charles G.
    de Bono, Johann S.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10013) : 70 - 82
  • [2] A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer
    Blute, M. L., Jr.
    Shiau, J. M.
    Truong, M.
    Shi, Fangfang
    Abel, E. J.
    Downs, T. M.
    Jarrard, D. F.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (05) : 729 - 735
  • [3] Where Do Transrectal Ultrasound- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies Miss Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2017, 110 : 154 - 160
  • [4] A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Pickles, Tom
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 954 - 960
  • [5] Prostate-specific Antigen Density Is a Good Predictor of Upstaging and Upgrading, According to the New Grading System: The Keys We Are Seeking May Be Already in Our Pocket
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Emiliozzi, Paolo
    Cardi, Antonio
    Antonio, De Vico
    Antonio, Iannello
    Aldo, Scapellato
    Tommaso, Riga
    Alberto, Pansadoro
    Gianluca, D'Elia
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 129 - 134
  • [6] Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?
    Calio, Brian P.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Sugano, Dordaneh
    Gaur, Sonia
    Maruf, Mahir
    Jain, Amit L.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04) : 976 - 981
  • [7] Biopsy Core Number Represents One of Foremost Predictors of Clinically Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading in Patients With Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Valiquette, Luc
    Perrotte, Paul
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Cestari, Andrea
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Salonia, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) : 1087 - 1091
  • [8] Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of upgrading and upstaging in patients with prostate cancer on biopsy: a radical prostatectomy multicenter cohort study
    Cosimo, De Nunzio
    Aldo, Brassetti
    Giuseppe, Simone
    Riccardo, Lombardo
    Riccardo, Mastroianni
    Devis, Collura
    Giovanni, Muto
    Michele, Gallucci
    Andrea, Tubaro
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (03) : 438 - 445
  • [9] The new Epstein gleason score classification significantly reduces upgrading in prostate cancer patients
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    Collura, Devis
    Muto, Giovanni
    Gallucci, Michele
    Carbone, Antonio
    Fuschi, Andrea
    Dutto, Lorenzo
    Witt, Joern Heinrich
    De Dominicis, Carlo
    Tubaro, Andrea
    [J]. EJSO, 2018, 44 (06): : 835 - 839
  • [10] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242