The "best place" debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers

被引:79
作者
Mirabella, RM [1 ]
Wish, NB
机构
[1] Seton Hall Univ, Grad Dept Publ & Hlth Care Adm, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA
[2] New York State Dept Social Serv, New York, NY USA
[3] Seton Hall Univ, Ctr Publ Serv, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0033-3352.00082
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article presents a critical examination of the curricular elements of nonprofit management degree programs in colleges of business, public administration, and social work. What are the major curricular elements in each type of program? How do the curricular elements of these programs compare with generic management degree programs? What are the central challenges Facing managers of nonprofit organizations, and how are these challenges addressed in each program? Based on the curricular review, is one setting more favorable for students of nonprofit management? What are the views of stakeholders regarding the "best place" to educate managers? Data collected from focus groups and surveys of stakeholders in each of these academic settings are presented. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for the future of nonprofit management education in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 229
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NONPROFIT SECTOR RES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, VOLUNTARY NONPROFIT
  • [3] [Anonymous], PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT, DOI DOI 10.1002/NML.9309
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1988, ED MANAGERS NONPROFI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1987, NONPROFIT SECTOR RES
  • [7] BLEDSTEIN BJ, 1977, RELATING WORK ED, P141
  • [8] BORIS E, 1993, NONPROFIT VOLUNTARY, V22, P219
  • [9] BURLINGAME D, 1996, NONPR MAN ED 1996 C
  • [10] CHICKERING AW, 1977, RELATING WORK ED, P125