Land-use choices: the case of conservation reserve program (CRP) re-enrollment in Kansas, USA

被引:18
作者
Caldas, Marcellus M. [1 ]
Bergtold, Jason S. [2 ]
Peterson, Jeffrey M. [3 ,4 ]
Earnhart, Dietrich H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Geog, 118 Seaton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66502 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Water Resources Ctr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Dept Econ, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conservation reserve program; farmers; contracts; land-use choices; Kansas; UNITED-STATES; PARTICIPATION; CONSEQUENCES; QUALITY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1080/1747423X.2016.1215563
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Among the important alternatives for land conservation is the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) that celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2015. This paper explores how landowners decide on alternative land-use choices made available by the expiration of CRP contracts in Kansas. The study uses survey data and multinomial Logit models to predict land-use choices. Two models were tested. The first model does not incorporate variables concerning farmer perceptions and attitudes about land-use choices, while the second model does. The results show that CRP re-enrollment depends on factors, such as years of experience in cropping and percent of cropland irrigated. However, when perception variables are added, the models become more robust in explaining other land choice alternatives. The results suggest that as the perception of unfairness of more inflexible environmental policy rises, these farmers may be more likely to re-enroll their marginal land in the CRP program.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 594
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]  
De La Torre Ugarte Daniel., 2006, Analysis of the economic impacts on the agricultural sector of the elimination of the conservation reserve program
[12]   Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function [J].
DeFries, RS ;
Foley, JA ;
Asner, GP .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (05) :249-257
[13]   Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century [J].
DeFries, Ruth S. ;
Rudel, Thomas ;
Uriarte, Maria ;
Hansen, Matthew .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2010, 3 (03) :178-181
[14]   The economic impacts of climate change:: Evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather [J].
Deschenes, Olivier ;
Greenstone, Michael .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) :354-385
[15]  
Dicks M. R., 1990, Current Farm Economics, V63, P43
[16]   Land change variability and human-environment dynamics in the United States Great Plains [J].
Drummond, Mark A. ;
Auch, Roger F. ;
Karstensen, Krista A. ;
Sayler, Kristi L. ;
Taylor, Janis L. ;
Loveland, Thomas R. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (03) :710-723
[17]  
Duke J. M., 2004, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V33, P34
[18]  
ERVIN CA, 1982, LAND ECON, V58, P277, DOI 10.2307/3145937
[19]  
ESSEKS JD, 1988, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V43, P251
[20]   Global consequences of land use [J].
Foley, JA ;
DeFries, R ;
Asner, GP ;
Barford, C ;
Bonan, G ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Chapin, FS ;
Coe, MT ;
Daily, GC ;
Gibbs, HK ;
Helkowski, JH ;
Holloway, T ;
Howard, EA ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Monfreda, C ;
Patz, JA ;
Prentice, IC ;
Ramankutty, N ;
Snyder, PK .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5734) :570-574