Land-use choices: the case of conservation reserve program (CRP) re-enrollment in Kansas, USA

被引:18
作者
Caldas, Marcellus M. [1 ]
Bergtold, Jason S. [2 ]
Peterson, Jeffrey M. [3 ,4 ]
Earnhart, Dietrich H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Geog, 118 Seaton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66502 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Water Resources Ctr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Dept Econ, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conservation reserve program; farmers; contracts; land-use choices; Kansas; UNITED-STATES; PARTICIPATION; CONSEQUENCES; QUALITY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1080/1747423X.2016.1215563
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Among the important alternatives for land conservation is the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) that celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2015. This paper explores how landowners decide on alternative land-use choices made available by the expiration of CRP contracts in Kansas. The study uses survey data and multinomial Logit models to predict land-use choices. Two models were tested. The first model does not incorporate variables concerning farmer perceptions and attitudes about land-use choices, while the second model does. The results show that CRP re-enrollment depends on factors, such as years of experience in cropping and percent of cropland irrigated. However, when perception variables are added, the models become more robust in explaining other land choice alternatives. The results suggest that as the perception of unfairness of more inflexible environmental policy rises, these farmers may be more likely to re-enroll their marginal land in the CRP program.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 594
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONS RES PROGR ANN S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 794 USDA EC RES SERV
[4]   The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: A study of CRP contracts [J].
Babcock, BA ;
Lakshminarayan, PG ;
Wu, JJ ;
Zilberman, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (04) :961-971
[5]  
Barry P. J., 1977, Agricultural Finance Review, V37, P50
[6]   Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines [J].
Butchart, Stuart H. M. ;
Walpole, Matt ;
Collen, Ben ;
van Strien, Arco ;
Scharlemann, Joern P. W. ;
Almond, Rosamunde E. A. ;
Baillie, Jonathan E. M. ;
Bomhard, Bastian ;
Brown, Claire ;
Bruno, John ;
Carpenter, Kent E. ;
Carr, Genevieve M. ;
Chanson, Janice ;
Chenery, Anna M. ;
Csirke, Jorge ;
Davidson, Nick C. ;
Dentener, Frank ;
Foster, Matt ;
Galli, Alessandro ;
Galloway, James N. ;
Genovesi, Piero ;
Gregory, Richard D. ;
Hockings, Marc ;
Kapos, Valerie ;
Lamarque, Jean-Francois ;
Leverington, Fiona ;
Loh, Jonathan ;
McGeoch, Melodie A. ;
McRae, Louise ;
Minasyan, Anahit ;
Morcillo, Monica Hernandez ;
Oldfield, Thomasina E. E. ;
Pauly, Daniel ;
Quader, Suhel ;
Revenga, Carmen ;
Sauer, John R. ;
Skolnik, Benjamin ;
Spear, Dian ;
Stanwell-Smith, Damon ;
Stuart, Simon N. ;
Symes, Andy ;
Tierney, Megan ;
Tyrrell, Tristan D. ;
Vie, Jean-Christophe ;
Watson, Reg .
SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5982) :1164-1168
[7]   Are farmers' decisions to work off the farm related to their decisions to participate in the conservation reserve program? [J].
Chang, Hung-Hao ;
Boisvert, Richard N. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2009, 41 (01) :71-85
[8]   Distinguishing between Whole-Farm vs. Partial-Farm Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program [J].
Chang, Hung-Hao ;
Boisvert, Richard N. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2009, 85 (01) :144-161
[9]   Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection [J].
Chouinard, Hayley H. ;
Paterson, Tobias ;
Wandschneider, Philip R. ;
Ohler, Adrienne M. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2008, 84 (01) :66-82
[10]   The effect of rental rates on the extension of conservation reserve program contracts [J].
Cooper, JC ;
Osborn, CT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :184-194