Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation

被引:185
作者
Jones, Andy [1 ]
Hillsdon, Melvyn [2 ]
Coombes, Emma
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, CEDAR, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Sch Sport & Hlth Sci, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
关键词
Equity; Deprivation; Greenspace; Physical activity; NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ENVIRONMENT; POPULATION; FACILITIES; RESOURCES; LEISURE; WALKING; PEOPLE; SAFETY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives, To understand the patterning of greenspace provision and use by area deprivation, and determine how deprivation moderates relationships with physical activity. Methods. The responses obtained from 6821 respondents to the 2005 The Quality of Life in your Neighbourhood Survey' undertaken in Bristol, England, were combined with objective measures of access to greenspaces. Area deprivation was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Descriptive analyses examined how mean distance, perceived greenspace access and safety, visit frequency, and physical activity varied by deprivation quartile. Logistic regression models examined how relationships were moderated by deprivation. Results. Respondents in more deprived areas lived closer to greenspaces, but reported poorer perceived accessibility, poorer safety, and less frequent use. Frequency of use dedined with distance but only in the most affluent areas. Relationships between physical activity and perceived accessibility, safety, and visit frequency were moderated by deprivation. Conclusions. The accessibility of greenspaces was better in more deprived areas but those residents had more negative perceptions and were less likely to use the greenspaces. Interventions may be most effective if they target the perceptions and needs of residents of deprived neighbourhoods. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 505
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bird W, 2007, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V57, P69
  • [2] *BRIST CIT COUNC, 2005, IND QUAL LIF BRIST, P84
  • [3] Playing it safe: The influence of neighbourhood safety on children's physical activity - A review
    Carver, Alison
    Timperio, Anna
    Crawford, David
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2008, 14 (02) : 217 - 227
  • [4] Craig R., 2008, Health Survey for England 2006, Volume 1: Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in adults
  • [5] Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status?
    Crawford, David
    Timperio, Anna
    Giles-Corti, Billie
    Ball, Kylie
    Hume, Clare
    Roberts, Rebecca
    Andrianopoulos, Nick
    Salmon, Jo
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2008, 14 (04) : 889 - 893
  • [6] *DEP COMM LOC GOV, 2006, PLANN POL STAT 3 PPS
  • [7] Resources for physical activity participation: Does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status?
    Estabrooks, PA
    Lee, RE
    Gyurcsik, NC
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (02) : 100 - 104
  • [8] The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity
    Giles-Corti, B
    Donovan, RJ
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (12) : 1793 - 1812
  • [9] Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population
    Huston, SL
    Evenson, KR
    Bors, P
    Gizlice, Z
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2003, 18 (01) : 58 - 69
  • [10] Jones AP., 2007, Obesogenic Environments: Evidence Review. Foresight Tackling Obesities: Future choices project long science review