A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: Three-year follow-up

被引:56
作者
Drenth, DJ
Veeger, NJGM
Winter, JB
Grandjean, JG
Mariani, MA
van Boven, AJ
Boonstra, PW
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Thoraxctr, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Pisa Univ Hosp, Thoraxctr, Pisa, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02536-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was done to identify the best treatment for an isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). BACKGROUND Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting (PCI) and of-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (surgery) are used to treat single-vessel disease of a high-grade stenosis of the proximal LAD. Midterm results of both treatments are compared in this prospective randomized study. METHODS In a single-center prospective trial, we randomly assigned 102 patients with a high-grade stenosis of the proximal LAD (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification type B2 or C) to PCI (n = 51) or surgery (n = 51). Primary composite end point was freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) at follow-up, including death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary end points were angina pectoris class and need for antianginal medication at follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT) and received treatment (RT). RESULTS Mean follow-up time was three years (90% midrange, two to four years). Incidence of MACCE was 23.5% after PCI and 9.8% after surgery; p = 0.07 ITT (24.1% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.04 RT). After surgery a significantly lower angina pectoris class (p = 0.02) and need for antianginal medication (p = 0.01) was found compared to PCI. Target vessel revascularization was 15.7% after PCI and 4.1% after surgery (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS At three-year follow-up (range, two to four years), a trend in favor of surgery is observed in regard to MACCE-free survival with a significantly lower angina pectoris status and significantly lower need for antianginal medication. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1960
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Boonstra PW, 1997, ANN THORAC SURG, V63, P567
  • [2] Pronounced benefit of coronary stenting and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in complex atherosclerotic lesions
    Cura, FA
    Bhatt, DL
    Lincoff, AM
    Kapadia, SR
    L'Allier, PL
    Ziada, KM
    Wolski, KE
    Moliterno, DJ
    Brener, SJ
    Ellis, SG
    Topol, EJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [3] Quality assessment in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting
    Diegeler, A
    Matin, M
    Falk, V
    Binner, C
    Walther, T
    Autschbach, R
    Mohr, FW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 16 : S67 - S72
  • [4] Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting in isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: Six months' angiographic and clinical follow-up of a prospective randomized study
    Drenth, DJ
    Winter, JB
    Veeger, NJGM
    Monnink, SHJ
    van Boven, AJ
    Grandjean, JG
    Mariani, MA
    Boonstra, PW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 124 (01) : 130 - 135
  • [5] A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: The SIMA trial
    Goy, JJ
    Kaufmann, U
    Goy-Eggenberger, D
    Garachemani, A
    Hurni, M
    Carrel, T
    Gaspardone, A
    Burnand, B
    Meier, B
    Versaci, F
    Tomai, F
    Bertel, O
    Pieper, M
    de Benedictis, M
    Eeckhout, E
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 75 (11) : 1116 - 1123
  • [6] Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass using the octopus method:: Results in the first one hundred patients
    Jansen, EWL
    Borst, C
    Lahpor, JR
    Gründeman, PF
    Eefting, FD
    Nierich, A
    de Medina, EOR
    Bredée, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 116 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [7] Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types
    Kastrati, A
    Mehilli, J
    Dirschinger, J
    Pache, J
    Ulm, K
    Schühlen, H
    Seyfarth, M
    Schmitt, C
    Blasini, R
    Neumann, FJ
    Schömig, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 87 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [8] Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies
    Lowe, HC
    Oesterle, SN
    Khachigian, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (02) : 183 - 193
  • [9] A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.
    Morice, M
    Serruys, PW
    Sousa, JE
    Fajadet, J
    Hayashi, EB
    Perin, M
    Colombo, A
    Schuler, G
    Barragan, P
    Guagliumi, G
    Molnar, F
    Falotico, R
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (23) : 1773 - 1780
  • [10] O'Keefe JH, 1999, CIRCULATION, V100, P114