Value of minimum intensity projections for chest CT in COVID-19 patients

被引:11
作者
Booz, Christian [1 ]
Vogl, Thomas J. [2 ]
Schoepf, U. Joseph [3 ]
Caruso, Damiano [3 ,4 ]
Inserra, Maria Cristina [11 ]
Yel, Ibrahim [1 ]
Martin, Simon S. [1 ,3 ]
Bucher, Andreas M. [2 ,3 ]
Lenga, Lukas [1 ]
Caudo, Danilo [1 ,5 ]
Schreckenbach, Teresa [6 ]
Schoell, Niklas [7 ]
Huegel, Christian [7 ]
Stratmann, Jan [8 ]
Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca [9 ]
Rachovitsky-Duarte, Daniel E. [10 ]
Laghi, Andrea [4 ]
De Santis, Domenico [3 ,4 ]
Mazziotti, Silvio [5 ]
D'Angelo, Tommaso [5 ,11 ]
Albrecht, Moritz H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Div Expt Imaging, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Sapienzia Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Messina, Dept Biomed Sci & Morphol & Funct Imaging, Messina, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Pneumonol, Frankfurt, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Frankfurt, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Cardiol, Frankfurt, Germany
[10] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England
[11] Univ Hosp Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Dept Radiol, Catania, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; Pneumonia; Viral infection; Multidetector computed tomography; Tomography; Spiral computed; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ROW CT; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109478
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether minimum intensity projection (MinIP) reconstructions enable more accurate depiction of pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) compared to standard transverse sections and multiplanar reformat (MPR) series in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Method: In this multinational study, chest CT scans of 185 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence, image quality regarding the assessment of GGO, as well as subjective time efficiency of MinIP and standard MPR series were analyzed based on the assessment of six radiologists. In addition, the suitability for COVID-19 evaluation, image quality regarding GGO and subjective time-efficiency in clinical routine was assessed by five clinicians. Results: The reference standard revealed a total of 149 CT scans with pulmonary GGO. MinIP reconstructions yielded significantly higher sensitivity (99.9 % vs 95.6 %), specificity (95.8 % vs 86.1 %) and accuracy (99.1 % vs 93.8 %) for assessing of GGO compared with standard MPR series. MinIP reconstructions achieved significantly higher ratings by radiologists concerning diagnostic confidence (medians, 5.00 vs 4.00), image quality (medians, 4.00 vs 4.00), contrast between GGO and unaffected lung parenchyma (medians, 5.00 vs 4.00) as well as subjective time-efficiency (medians, 5.00 vs 4.00) compared with MPR-series (all P < .001). Clinicians preferred MinIP reconstructions for COVID-19 assessment (medians, 5.00 vs 3.00), image quality regarding GGO (medians, 5.00 vs 3.00) and subjective time-efficiency in clinical routine (medians, 5.00 vs 3.00). Conclusions: MinIP reconstructions improve the assessment of COVID-19 in chest CT compared to standard images and may be suitable for routine application.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, RADIOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1148/RADIOL.2020200642
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, N Engl J Med
[3]   Lung perfusion in patients with pulmonary hypertension: Comparison between MDCT pulmonary angiography with minIP reconstructions and 99mTc-MAA perfusion scan [J].
Bartalena, Tommaso ;
Oboldi, Devil ;
Guidalotti, Pier Luigi ;
Rinaldi, Maria Francesca ;
Bertaccini, Paola ;
Napoli, Gabriella ;
Gavelli, Giampaolo .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (06) :368-373
[4]   Multi-detector row CT and postprocessing techniques in the assessment of diffuse lung disease [J].
Beigelman-Aubry, C ;
Hill, C ;
Guibal, A ;
Savatovsky, J ;
Grenier, PA .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (06) :1639-1652
[5]   Diffuse lung disease: Assessment with helical CT - Preliminary observations of the role of maximum and minimum intensity projection images [J].
Bhalla, M ;
Naidich, DP ;
McGuinness, G ;
Gruden, JF ;
Leitman, BS ;
McCauley, DI .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (02) :341-347
[6]  
Choi H, 2020, RADIOL-CARDIOTHORAC, V2, DOI 10.1148/ryct.2020200107
[7]   AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT - Image processing in CT [J].
Cody, DD .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (05) :1255-1268
[8]   Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction:: comparison with MRCP [J].
Denecke, Timm ;
Degutyte, Erika ;
Stelter, Lars ;
Lehmkuhl, Lukas ;
Valencia, Ray ;
Lopez-Haenninen, Enrique ;
Felix, Roland ;
Stroszczynski, Christian .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (08) :1719-1726
[9]   Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR [J].
Fang, Yicheng ;
Zhang, Huangqi ;
Xie, Jicheng ;
Lin, Minjie ;
Ying, Lingjun ;
Pang, Peipei ;
Ji, Wenbin .
RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (02) :E115-E117
[10]   Methods for Calculating Sensitivity and Specificity of Clustered Data: A Tutorial [J].
Genders, Tessa S. S. ;
Spronk, Sandra ;
Stijnen, Theo ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Lesaffre, Emmanuel ;
Hunink, M. G. Myriam .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :910-916