The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned

被引:7
|
作者
Co, Zoe [1 ]
Holmgren, A. Jay [2 ]
Classen, David C. [3 ]
Newmark, Lisa P. [4 ]
Seger, Diane L. [4 ]
Cole, Jessica M. [5 ]
Pon, Barbara [6 ]
Zimmer, Karen P. [7 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Clin & Qual Anal, Somerville, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[6] Collaborat Healthcare Patient Safety Org, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic health record; computerized physician order entry; ambulatory care; patient safety; quality of care; medication safety; medication reconciliation;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1722917
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the Introduction of Electronic Health Record: Lessons from European and North American Countries
    Bonomi, Sabrina
    Badr, Nabil Georges
    Zardini, Alessandro
    Rossignoli, Cecilia
    EXPLORING SERVICES SCIENCE (IESS 2016), 2016, 247 : 635 - 648
  • [32] The Electronic Health Record as a Quality Improvement Tool Exceptional Potential with Special Considerations
    Carr, Leah H.
    Christ, Lori
    Ferro, Daria F.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 50 (02) : 473 - 488
  • [33] Development and validation of a pulmonary function test data extraction tool for the US department of veterans affairs electronic health record
    Rabin, Alexander S.
    Weinstein, Julien B.
    Seelye, Sarah M.
    Whittington, Taylor N.
    Hogan, Cainnear K.
    Prescott, Hallie C.
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [34] Development and Utilization of a Diagnostic Support Tool for Asthma within the Electronic Medical Record
    Prateek J. Shukla
    Piper Sandel
    Gurpreet Phull
    Janine A. Rethy
    Journal of Medical Systems, 46
  • [35] Development and Utilization of a Diagnostic Support Tool for Asthma within the Electronic Medical Record
    Shukla, Prateek J.
    Sandel, Piper
    Phull, Gurpreet
    Rethy, Janine A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 46 (10)
  • [36] Development of a patient safety culture measurement tool for ambulatory health care settings: Analysis of content validity
    Schutz A.L.
    Counte M.A.
    Meurer S.
    Health Care Management Science, 2007, 10 (2) : 139 - 149
  • [37] Evaluation of an electronic health record Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE)
    Romero, Andrew
    Gomez-Lumbreras, Ainhoa
    Villa-Zapata, Lorenzo
    Tan, Malinda
    Horn, John
    Malone, Daniel C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2024, 81 (22) : 1142 - 1157
  • [38] Software Product Quality Evaluation Guide for Electronic Health Record Systems
    de Lima, Luis F.
    Huve, Cristiane A. G.
    Peres, Leticia M.
    34TH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, SBES 2020, 2020, : 108 - 113
  • [39] Design and evaluation of a web-based electronic health record for amblyopia
    Naemi, Roya
    Akbarian, Mina
    Ebrahimi, Maryam
    Shahmoradi, Leila
    Masoomian, Babak
    Rezayi, Sorayya
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [40] ResearchMatch on FHIR: Development and evaluation of a recruitment registry and electronic health record system interface for volunteer profile completion
    Cheng, Alex C.
    Dunkel, Leah
    Byrne, Loretta M.
    Tischbein, Maeve
    Burts, Delicia
    Hamilton, Jahi
    Phillips, Kaysi
    Embry, Bryce
    Tan, Jason
    Olson, Erik
    Harris, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)