The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned

被引:7
|
作者
Co, Zoe [1 ]
Holmgren, A. Jay [2 ]
Classen, David C. [3 ]
Newmark, Lisa P. [4 ]
Seger, Diane L. [4 ]
Cole, Jessica M. [5 ]
Pon, Barbara [6 ]
Zimmer, Karen P. [7 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Clin & Qual Anal, Somerville, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[6] Collaborat Healthcare Patient Safety Org, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic health record; computerized physician order entry; ambulatory care; patient safety; quality of care; medication safety; medication reconciliation;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1722917
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Archetype Development Process of Electronic Health Record of Minas Gerais
    Maia, Thais Abreu
    De Muylder, Cristiana Fernandes
    Queiroga, Rodrigo Mendonca
    MEDINFO 2015: EHEALTH-ENABLED HEALTH, 2015, 216 : 938 - 938
  • [22] The Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) implementation of the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record (VLER): Findings and lessons learned from Health Information Exchange at 12 sites
    Byrne, Colene M.
    Mercincavage, Lauren M.
    Bouhaddou, Omar
    Bennett, Jamie R.
    Pan, Eric C.
    Botts, Nathan E.
    Olinger, Lois M.
    Hunolt, Elaine
    Banty, Karl H.
    Cromwell, Tim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 83 (08) : 537 - 547
  • [23] Implementing an Electronic Point-of-Care Medical Record at an Organized Athletic Event: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Lessons Learned
    Wells, Hamilton J.
    Higgins, George L., III
    Baumann, Michael R.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2010, 20 (05): : 377 - 378
  • [24] Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinician ambulatory electronic health record use
    Holmgren, A. Jay
    Downing, N. Lance
    Tang, Mitchell
    Sharp, Christopher
    Longhurst, Christopher
    Huckman, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (03) : 453 - 460
  • [25] Identification of Prescribing Errors in an Electronic Health Record Using a Retract-and-Reorder Tool: A Pilot Study
    Devin, Joan
    Cullinan, Shane
    Looi, Claudia
    Cleary, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2022, 18 (07) : E1076 - E1082
  • [26] Electronic Health Record Diagnosis tool and a cross reference between coding standards
    Soteriades, Harris
    Neokleous, Kleanthis
    Tsouloupas, George
    Jossif, Antonis P.
    Christos, Schizas N.
    IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS & BIOENGINEERING, 2012, : 30 - 33
  • [27] Leveraging Structural Changes in an Electronic Health Record Tool to Standardize Written Handoff
    Zavodnick, Jillian
    Jaffe, Rebecca
    Altshuler, Marc
    Cowan, Scott
    Wickersham, Alexis
    Diemer, Gretchen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2019, 34 (04) : 354 - 359
  • [28] Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
    Hui C.
    Vaillancourt R.
    Bair L.
    Wong E.
    King J.W.
    Drugs - Real World Outcomes, 2016, 3 (2) : 231 - 238
  • [29] Development and piloting of a software tool to facilitate proactive hazard and risk analysis of Health Information Technology
    Habli, Ibrahim
    Jia, Yan
    White, Sean
    Gabriel, George
    Lawton, Tom
    Sujan, Mark
    Tomsett, Clive
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (01) : 683 - 702
  • [30] Novel Nonproprietary Measures of Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Use Associated with Physician Work Exhaustion
    Sinha, Amrita
    Shanafelt, Tait D.
    Trockel, Mickey
    Wang, Hanhan
    Sharp, Christopher
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 12 (03): : 637 - 646