Capture of stormwater runoff and pollutants by three types of urban best management practices

被引:5
作者
Karnatz, C. [1 ]
Thompson, J. R. [2 ]
Logsdon, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] ATC Grp Serv LLC, Environm Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, USDA ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA USA
关键词
bioretention cells; infiltration rates; infiltrometer; native landscaping; stormwater management; urban riparian buffers; WATER-QUALITY; RAINFALL INTENSITY; DENITRIFICATION; BIORETENTION; RESTORATION; PHOSPHORUS; RETENTION; NITRATE; SOIL; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.74.5.487
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Land cover changes associated with urbanization produce hydrological alterations, which often diminish infiltration, leading to increased runoff volumes, peak flows, and greater need for pollution control. A number of urban "green infrastructure" best management practices (BMPs) have been designed to capture and contain stormwater runoff near the source. Although implementation of such practices has slowly increased, lack of evidence about their effectiveness in reducing the quantity and improving the quality of stormwater runoff may still limit the degree to which they are implemented. The objectives of this study were to assess performance of three types of urban stormwater BMPs by measuring their soil characteristics, infiltration rates, runoff reduction, and water quality parameters compared to adjacent contributing areas. Three types of practices-bioretention cells, native landscaping (reconstructed prairie areas), and three-zone vegetated riparian buffers located in Ames and Ankeny, Iowa-were assessed by conducting infiltration tests and collecting soil and water samples. For the biocells in particular, practice surface areas were smaller in relation to their contributing areas than is recommended in current design criteria. On average, the bioretention cells and the buffers' wooded zones had significantly lower soil bulk densities, higher infiltration rates, and smaller runoff volumes than those of contributing areas.Time-to-runoff was particularly high for bioretention cells. Infiltration characteristics of the native landscapes (reconstructed prairie) and buffer prairie zones we studied were not significantly different from those of the contributing areas. Total extractable hydrocarbon concentrations were elevated in the bioretention cells, while metals such as chromium (Cr) had greater concentrations in the contributing areas. Based on these findings, we recommend careful attention to sizing, particularly for biocells, and suggest routine incorporation of soil amendments (such as compost) to improve the performance of reconstructed prairie areas. Our findings also suggest that more widespread implementation of these source-control measures in retrofit of existing developments and/or in the design of newly urbanizing areas will be effective for reducing stormwater runoff volumes and improving water quality.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 499
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding the dynamics of microplastics transport in urban stormwater runoff: Implications for pollution control and management
    Beheshtimaal, Arghavan
    Alamdari, Nasrin
    Wang, Binbin
    Kamali, Meysam
    Salehi, Maryam
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 356
  • [42] Is Denser Greener? An Evaluation of Higher Density Development as an Urban Stormwater-Quality Best Management Practice
    Jacob, John S.
    Lopez, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2009, 45 (03): : 687 - 701
  • [43] Stormwater ponds: Unaccounted environmental challenges of a widely-adopted best management practice in urban landscapes
    Lusk, Mary G.
    Bean, Eban Z.
    Basil, V. Iannone, III
    Reisinger, Alexander J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 374
  • [44] Urban Stormwater Runoff: A Major Pathway for Anthropogenic Particles, Black Rubbery Fragments, and Other Types of Microplastics to Urban Receiving Waters
    Werbowski, Larissa M.
    Gilbreath, Alicia N.
    Munno, Keenan
    Zhu, Xia
    Grbic, Jelena
    Wu, Tina
    Sutton, Rebecca
    Sedlak, Margaret D.
    Deshpande, Ashok D.
    Rochman, Chelsea M.
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2021, 1 (06): : 1420 - 1428
  • [45] Comparing Costs of Onsite Best Management Practices to Nutrient Credits for Stormwater Management: A Case Study in Virginia
    Nobles, Alicia L.
    Goodall, Jonathan L.
    Fitch, G. Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (01): : 131 - 143
  • [46] Monitoring the effects of urban and forested land uses on runoff quality: Implications for improved stormwater management
    Simpson, Ian M.
    Winston, Ryan J.
    Dorsey, Jay D.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 862
  • [47] Public perception towards river and water conservation practices: Opportunities for implementing urban stormwater management practices
    Gao, Yuling
    Church, Sarah P.
    Peel, Sara
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 223 : 478 - 488
  • [48] Evaluation of the capability of low-impact development practices for the removal of heavy metal from urban stormwater runoff
    Maniquiz-Redillas, Marla C.
    Kim, Lee-Hyung
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 37 (18) : 2265 - 2272
  • [49] Statistical techniques in correlation analysis of stormwater pollutants for improved management of constructed wetlands in urban cities
    Fujia Yang
    Shirley Gato-Trinidad
    Iqbal Hossain
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197 (7)
  • [50] A LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL MODEL FOR WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES IN URBAN GREENWAYS
    MCGUCKIN, CP
    BROWN, RD
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1995, 33 (1-3) : 227 - 246