Capture of stormwater runoff and pollutants by three types of urban best management practices

被引:5
作者
Karnatz, C. [1 ]
Thompson, J. R. [2 ]
Logsdon, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] ATC Grp Serv LLC, Environm Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, USDA ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA USA
关键词
bioretention cells; infiltration rates; infiltrometer; native landscaping; stormwater management; urban riparian buffers; WATER-QUALITY; RAINFALL INTENSITY; DENITRIFICATION; BIORETENTION; RESTORATION; PHOSPHORUS; RETENTION; NITRATE; SOIL; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.74.5.487
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Land cover changes associated with urbanization produce hydrological alterations, which often diminish infiltration, leading to increased runoff volumes, peak flows, and greater need for pollution control. A number of urban "green infrastructure" best management practices (BMPs) have been designed to capture and contain stormwater runoff near the source. Although implementation of such practices has slowly increased, lack of evidence about their effectiveness in reducing the quantity and improving the quality of stormwater runoff may still limit the degree to which they are implemented. The objectives of this study were to assess performance of three types of urban stormwater BMPs by measuring their soil characteristics, infiltration rates, runoff reduction, and water quality parameters compared to adjacent contributing areas. Three types of practices-bioretention cells, native landscaping (reconstructed prairie areas), and three-zone vegetated riparian buffers located in Ames and Ankeny, Iowa-were assessed by conducting infiltration tests and collecting soil and water samples. For the biocells in particular, practice surface areas were smaller in relation to their contributing areas than is recommended in current design criteria. On average, the bioretention cells and the buffers' wooded zones had significantly lower soil bulk densities, higher infiltration rates, and smaller runoff volumes than those of contributing areas.Time-to-runoff was particularly high for bioretention cells. Infiltration characteristics of the native landscapes (reconstructed prairie) and buffer prairie zones we studied were not significantly different from those of the contributing areas. Total extractable hydrocarbon concentrations were elevated in the bioretention cells, while metals such as chromium (Cr) had greater concentrations in the contributing areas. Based on these findings, we recommend careful attention to sizing, particularly for biocells, and suggest routine incorporation of soil amendments (such as compost) to improve the performance of reconstructed prairie areas. Our findings also suggest that more widespread implementation of these source-control measures in retrofit of existing developments and/or in the design of newly urbanizing areas will be effective for reducing stormwater runoff volumes and improving water quality.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 499
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing urban rainfall-runoff response to stormwater management extent
    Miller, Andrew J.
    Welty, Claire
    Duncan, Jonathan M.
    Baeck, Mary Lynn
    Smith, James A.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2021, 35 (07)
  • [22] Stormwater Control Measures for Runoff and Water Quality Management in Urban Landscapes
    Sadeghi, K. Majid
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    Kharaghani, Shahram
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2018, 54 (01): : 124 - 133
  • [23] Edge-of-Field Runoff Analysis following Grazing and Silvicultural Best Management Practices in Northeast Texas
    Wagner, Kevin L.
    Gregory, Lucas
    Gerlich, Jason A.
    Rhodes, Edward C.
    deVilleneuve, Stephanie
    WATER, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [24] Effect of Urban Stormwater Road Runoff of Different Land Use Types on an Urban River in Shenzhen, China
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Chunyi
    Yu, Yang
    Chen, Yongyu
    Du, Longfei
    Qu, Xiaodong
    Peng, Wenqi
    Zhang, Min
    Gui, Chenxin
    WATER, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [25] Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale
    Loperfido, J. V.
    Noe, Gregory B.
    Jarnagin, S. Taylor
    Hogan, Dianna M.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 2584 - 2595
  • [26] The effects of infiltration-based stormwater best management practices on the hydrology and phosphorus budget of a eutrophic urban lake
    Small, Gaston E.
    Niederluecke, Elizabeth Q.
    Shrestha, Paliza
    Janke, Benjamin D.
    Finlay, Jacques C.
    LAKE AND RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT, 2019, 35 (01) : 38 - 50
  • [27] A New Decision Support Tool for Evaluating the Impact of Stormwater Management Systems on Urban Runoff Pollution
    Vinck, Evi
    De Bock, Birgit
    Wambecq, Tom
    Liekens, Els
    Delgado, Rosalia
    WATER, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [28] Toward better practices in infiltration regulations for urban stormwater management
    Petrucci, Guido
    De Bondt, Kevin
    Claeys, Philippe
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (05) : 546 - 550
  • [29] SIMULATION OF COMBINED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
    Damodaram, Chandana
    Giacomoni, Marcio H.
    Khedun, C. Prakash
    Holmes, Hillary
    Ryan, Andrea
    Saour, William
    Zechman, Emily M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2010, 46 (05): : 907 - 918
  • [30] Stormwater best management practices: Experimental evaluation of chemical cocktails mobilized by freshwater salinization syndrome
    Galella, Joseph G.
    Kaushal, Sujay S.
    Mayer, Paul M.
    Maas, Carly M.
    Shatkay, Ruth R.
    Stutzke, Robert A.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11