Need for cognitive closure and attention allocation during multitasking: Evidence from eye-tracking studies

被引:8
作者
Szumowska, Ewa [1 ]
Kossowska, Malgorzata [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Ingardena Str 6, PL-30060 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Need for closure; Attention; Multitasking; Divided attention; Eye-tracking; Focused and distributed attention; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SUBCORTICAL CONTRIBUTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DEFOCUSED ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; POLYCHRONICITY; PERSONALITY; INHIBITION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two studies, we examine how need for cognitive closure (NFC), referring to an individual's tendency to reduce uncertainty via rigid processing style, relates to the way attentional resources are distributed while multitasking. Previous studies show that NFC is related to focused, rather than distributed, attention. High NFC individuals should thus process tasks serially rather than in parallel. That is, in order to maintain performance on an additional task, they would need to shift attentional focus to this task more often. Low NFC individuals, on the other hand, should be able to process both tasks in parallel, i.e. they would maintain performance on the additional task with fewer attentional shifts. To test our hypotheses, we asked participants to perform a main and additional task simultaneously. During task performance participants' eyes were tracked. In line with our predictions, the interest area analysis showed that NFC was related to more fixations and longer dwell time on the additional task. It was also associated with more runs to this task (Studies 1 and 2). The effects were stronger in difficult, compared to easy, condition (Study 2). The paper is the first one to directly test attention allocation during multitasking depending on NFC levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 280
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Juggling on a high wire: Multitasking effects on performance
    Adler, Rachel F.
    Benbunan-Fich, Raquel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2012, 70 (02) : 156 - 168
  • [2] The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching
    Arrington, Catherine M.
    Yates, Melissa M.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (04) : 660 - 665
  • [3] Processing statistics: An examination of focused and distributed attention using event related potentials
    Baijal, Shruti
    Nakatani, Chie
    van Leeuwen, Cees
    Srinivasan, Narayanan
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 85 : 20 - 25
  • [4] Baldauf D., 2007, EXPT BRAIN RES, V11, P411
  • [5] BERGEN JR, 1983, NATURE, V28, P241
  • [6] Extremely Selective Attention: Eye-Tracking Studies of the Dynamic Allocation of Attention to Stimulus Features in Categorization
    Blair, Mark R.
    Watson, Marcus R.
    Walshe, R. Calen
    Maj, Fillip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (05) : 1196 - 1206
  • [7] TASK COMBINATION AND SELECTIVE INTAKE OF INFORMATION
    BROADBENT, DE
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1982, 50 (03) : 253 - 290
  • [8] Eye movement evidence for defocused attention in dysphoria - A perceptual span analysis
    Brzezicka, Aneta
    Krejtz, Izabela
    von Hecker, Ulrich
    Laubrock, Jochen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (01) : 129 - 133
  • [9] Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance
    Buehner, Markus
    Koenig, Cornelius J.
    Pick, Marion
    Krurnm, Stefan
    [J]. HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2006, 19 (03) : 253 - 275
  • [10] On the impact of new technologies on multitasking
    Cardoso-Leite, Pedro
    Green, C. Shawn
    Bavelier, Daphne
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2015, 35 : 98 - 112