Leaf proteome comparison of two GM common bean varieties and their non-GM counterparts by principal component analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Valentim-Neto, Pedro A. [1 ]
Rossi, Gabriela B. [1 ]
Anacleto, Kelly B. [1 ]
de Mello, Carla S. [1 ]
Balsamo, Geisi M. [1 ]
Arisi, Ana Carolina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Food Sci & Technol Dept, Rod Admar Gonzaga 1346, BR-88034001 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
proteome; proteomics; Phaseolus vulgaris; GMO; Embrapa; 5.1; 2-DIMENSIONAL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED CROPS; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; MAIZE VARIETIES; PROTEINS; PLANT; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; EXPRESSION; GENOTYPES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.7166
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A genetically modified (GM) common bean event, namely Embrapa 5.1, was approved for commercialization in Brazil. The present work aimed to use principal component analysis (PCA) to compare the proteomic profile of this GM common bean and its non-GM counterpart. RESULTS: Seedlings from four Brazilian common bean varieties were grown under controlled environmental conditions. Leaf proteomic profiles were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE). First, a comparison among 12 gels from four common bean varieties was performed by PCA using volume percentage of 198 matched spots, presented in all gels. The first twoprincipal components (PC) accounted for 46.8% of total variation. Two groups were clearly separated by the first component: Perola and GMPerola fromPontal and GM Pontal. Secondly, another comparison among six gels from the same variety GM and its non-GM counterpart was performed by PCA; in this case it was possible to distinguish GM and non-GM. CONCLUSION: Separation between leaf proteomic profile of GM common bean variety and its counterpart was observed only when they were compared in pairs. These results showed higher similarity between GM variety and its counterpart than between two common bean varieties. PCA is a useful tool to compare proteomes of GM and non-GM plant varieties. (C) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 932
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Varieties of Genetically Modified (GM) Embrapa 5.1 Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Their Non-GM Counterparts
    Balsamo, Geisi M.
    Valentim-Neto, Pedro A.
    Mello, Carla S.
    Arisi, Ana C. M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2015, 63 (48) : 10569 - 10577
  • [2] Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics
    Barros, Eugenia
    Lezar, Sabine
    Anttonen, Mikko J.
    van Dijk, Jeroen P.
    Roehlig, Richard M.
    Kok, Esther J.
    Engel, Karl-Heinz
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (04) : 436 - 451
  • [3] Tuber proteome comparison of five potato varieties by principal component analysis
    de Mello, Carla Souza
    Van Dijk, Jeroen P.
    Voorhuijzen, Marleen
    Kok, Esther J.
    Maisonnave Arisi, Ana Carolina
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2016, 96 (11) : 3928 - 3936
  • [4] Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields
    Anna Coll
    Anna Nadal
    Michel Rossignol
    Pere Puigdomènech
    Maria Pla
    Transgenic Research, 2011, 20 : 939 - 949
  • [5] Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields
    Coll, Anna
    Nadal, Anna
    Rossignol, Michel
    Puigdomenech, Pere
    Pla, Maria
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (04) : 939 - 949
  • [6] Natural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practices
    Coll, Anna
    Nadal, Anna
    Collado, Rosa
    Capellades, Gemma
    Kubista, Mikael
    Messeguer, Joaquima
    Pla, Maria
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (03) : 349 - 362