On the Ground-Motion Models for Chinese Seismic Hazard Mapping

被引:19
|
作者
Hong, Han Ping [1 ]
Feng, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
关键词
MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY; ATTENUATION; DISTANCE; REGION; RISK; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1785/0120180269
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The ground-motion models (GMMs) used to map seismic hazard in China were developed based on the so-called projection method, assuming relations of a pair of predicted macrointensities and of a pair of predicted ground-motion measures in two different regions. The use of such a method is necessary because the ground-motion records of a large number of strong earthquakes are lacking in mainland China, although the catalog of historical Chinese earthquakes is relatively rich. A critical review of the GMMs adopted to develop the third-, fourth-, and fifth-generation Chinese seismic hazard maps (CSHMs) for mainland China suggests that some of the information used to project these models, such as the earthquake magnitude interpretation and GMM for the macrointensity, may need additional justification, and that the standard deviation (sigma) of the GMMs may be low. Also, new GMMs applicable to mainland China are developed based on the projection method and a set of the GMMs from the Next Generation Attenuation relationships. The results obtained using newly projected GMMs and seismic hazard analysis indicate that the ratio of the return period values of the peak ground acceleration obtained using the newly projected GMMs and using the GMMs adopted for the fifth-generation CSHM is about 1.35 for a return period range from 50 to 2475 yr. Part of this increase is attributed to the differences in the standard deviations of residuals for the newly projected GMMs and the adopted GMMs used to map seismic hazard for mainland China. The results also suggest that the shape of the adopted seismic design spectrum in Chinese structural design code differs from the uniform hazard spectra obtained based on the newly projected GMMs for simple seismic source zones.
引用
收藏
页码:2106 / 2124
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ranking of several ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in Iran
    Ghasemi, H.
    Zare, M.
    Fukushima, Y.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [2] Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis in California Using Nonergodic Ground-Motion Models
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    Kuehn, Nicolas M.
    Walling, Melanie
    Landwehr, Niels
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (04) : 1235 - 1249
  • [3] The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Subduction ground-motion models
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Powers, Peter M.
    Altekruse, Jason
    Ahdi, Sean K.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Frankel, Arthur D.
    Wirth, Erin A.
    Smith, James A.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Withers, Kyle B.
    Herrick, Julie A.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (03) : 1739 - 1786
  • [4] Assessing Predictive Capability of Ground-Motion Models for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard in Iran
    Farhadi, Ali
    Farajpour, Zoya
    Pezeshk, Shahram
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (05) : 2073 - 2087
  • [5] Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey
    Akkar, Sinan
    Kale, Ozkan
    Yakut, Ahmet
    Ceken, Ulubey
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (08) : 3439 - 3463
  • [6] On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Douglas, John
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Bungum, Hilmar
    Faeh, Donat
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) : 783 - 793
  • [7] Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence
    McNamara, Daniel E.
    Wolin, Emily L. G.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Powers, Peter M.
    Shumway, Alison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Wilson, David C.
    Benz, Harley M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) : 1517 - 1529
  • [8] Capturing and limiting ground-motion uncertainty in seismic hazard assessment
    Bommer, JJ
    Scherbaum, F
    DIRECTIONS IN STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION, 2005, 58 : 25 - 40
  • [9] On the Forecasting of Ground-Motion Parameters for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
    不详
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2011, 27 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [10] Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey
    Sinan Akkar
    Özkan Kale
    Ahmet Yakut
    Ulubey Çeken
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 3439 - 3463