Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study

被引:19
作者
Pan, Y. -H.
Ramp, L. C.
Lin, C. -K.
Liu, P. -R.
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Dent, Chilung, Taiwan
[2] UAB, Sch Dent, Dept Comprehens Dent, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
tensile bond strength; marginal leakage; implant; cement; thermal cycling; compression;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01673.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Few data exist regarding cement failure load and marginal leakage of castings cemented to implant-supported abutments subjected to load and thermal cycling, especially with newer cements. This study evaluated the cement failure load and marginal leakage of castings cemented to Steri-Oss abutment/analog assemblies with one of seven luting protocols (n = 5). Protocols consisted of a zinc phosphate control, zinc phosphate with petroleum jelly, TempBond, TempBond NE, ImProv, ImProv with petroleum jelly and Provilink. Cemented castings were subjected to cyclic axial compression of 75 N for 100 000 cycles, 1000 thermal cycles (5-55 degrees C), and immersed 24 h in 0.5% basic fuchsin. The castings were then loaded in tension until cement failure. Cement failure load was analysed using ANOVA and Fischer's PLSD (alpha = 0.05). Marginal leakage on the intaglio of the casting was scored with the unaided eye on a scale of 0-2, and analysed with Duncan's multiple range (alpha = 0.05). Similar groups are noted by superscript. Cement failure load (from lowest to highest): ImProv with petroleum jelly(a), TempBond(a), ImProv(a), Tempbond NEa, Provilink(a), zinc phosphate with petroleum jelly(b), zinc phosphate(c) (P < 0.0001). Marginal leakage scores (from lowest to highest): ImProv(a), Provilink(a), ImProv with petroleum jelly(a), zinc phosphate(ab), zinc phosphate with petroleum jelly(ab), TempBond(bc), and TempBond NEc (P = 0.01). Addition of petroleum jelly to zinc phosphate lowered cement failure load without affecting marginal leakage. ImProv and Provilink demonstrated relatively low cement failure load, as well as lowest marginal leakage.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alfaro Miguel A, 2004, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, V12, P33
[2]  
Andersson B, 1998, INT J PROSTHODONT, V11, P212
[3]   Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns [J].
Baldissara, P ;
Comin, G ;
Martone, F ;
Scotti, R .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (04) :417-422
[4]  
Bernal Guillermo, 2003, J Prosthodont, V12, P111, DOI 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00006-8
[5]   USE OF LUTING AGENTS WITH AN IMPLANT SYSTEM .1. [J].
BREEDING, LC ;
DIXON, DL ;
BOGACKI, MT ;
TIETGE, JD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (05) :737-741
[6]   Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper [J].
Bresciano, M ;
Schierano, G ;
Manzella, C ;
Screti, A ;
Bignardi, C ;
Preti, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (05) :594-598
[7]   Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns [J].
Chan, DCN ;
Wilson, AH ;
Barbe, P ;
Cronin, RJ ;
Chung, C ;
Chung, K .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (10) :1007-1013
[8]   USE OF LUTING AGENTS WITH AN IMPLANT SYSTEM .2. [J].
DIXON, DL ;
BREEDING, LC ;
LILLY, KR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (06) :885-890
[9]  
Drago CJ, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P534
[10]   Comparison of the tensile bond strengths of cast metal crowns luted with resin cements [J].
Fonseca, RG ;
dos Santos Cruz, CA ;
Adabo, GL ;
Vaz, LG .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (11) :1080-1084