Life cycle comparison of marine fuels for IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap

被引:47
作者
Bilgili, Levent [1 ]
机构
[1] Bandirma Onyedi Eylul Univ, Maritime Fac, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Balikesir, Turkey
关键词
Marine fuels; IMO Sulphur Cap; Life cycle assessment; EMISSION CONTROL AREA; SHIP EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; SEA; REGULATIONS; SECA; TRANSPORTATION; REDUCTION; BENEFITS; PARTICLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145719
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ships, which are the backbone of world trade, are also major emission generators. IMO has prepared a regulation that came into force on January 1, 2020, in particular to reduce ship-related sulphur oxides. Accordingly, the sulphur content of the marine fuels cannot exceed 0.5% by mass. Although these fuels have a significant effect in reducing the sulphur oxides, the holistic environmental effects of the fuels must be examined within a life cycle perspective. In this study, LCA of four different marine fuels were realized and the environmental impacts of the fuels in production, distribution, and operation processes were investigated. The main purpose of this study is to increase precision by focusing on a small number of fuels, while increasing accuracy by obtaining a large number of LCA results. It is concluded that despite the success of low sulphur fuels during operation, the overall environmental effects are higher than other fuels. According to the LCA results, there are no significant differences between the fuels and HFO still remains an important and preferable fuel for the environment. Consequently, in life cycle perspective, it was concluded that the expected results of IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap are not at a desirable level. Thus, alternative fuels would be more beneficial in terms of total environmental issues and IMO should focus more on developing new regulations and policies on alternative fuels. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: Fuel switching or installing a scrubber?
    Abadie, Luis Maria
    Goicoechea, Nestor
    Galarraga, Ibon
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 57 : 237 - 250
  • [2] Measurements of air pollution emission factors for marine transportation in SECA
    Alfoeldy, B.
    Loeoev, J. B.
    Lagler, F.
    Mellqvist, J.
    Berg, N.
    Beecken, J.
    Weststrate, H.
    Duyzer, J.
    Bencs, L.
    Horemans, B.
    Cavalli, F.
    Putaud, J. -P.
    Janssens-Maenhout, G.
    Csordas, A. P.
    Van Grieken, R.
    Borowiak, A.
    Hjorth, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2013, 6 (07) : 1777 - 1791
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, KEY WORLD ENERGY STA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, SHELL ULSFO SPECIFIC
  • [5] Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping
    Antturi, Jim
    Hanninen, Otto
    Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka
    Johansson, Lasse
    Prank, Marje
    Sofiev, Mikhail
    Ollikainen, Markku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 184 : 431 - 440
  • [6] Bengtsson S., 2011, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
  • [7] Environmental and economic analysis of waste management scenarios for a warship in life cycle perspective
    Bilgili, Levent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (04) : 1113 - 1125
  • [8] Bilsback K.R., 2020, SO X REDUCTIONS SHIP
  • [9] BRYNOLF S., 2014, Environmental Assessment of Present and Future Marine Fuels
  • [10] Have Emission Control Areas (ECAs) harmed port efficiency in Europe?
    Chang, Young-Tae
    Park, Hyosoo
    Lee, Suhyung
    Kim, Eunsoo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 58 : 39 - 53