Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions

被引:240
作者
Torelli, Riccardo [1 ]
Balluchi, Federica [1 ]
Lazzini, Arianna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Econ & Management, Via JF Kennedy 6, I-43125 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Commun & Econ, Reggio Emilia, Italy
关键词
corporate social responsibility; environmental communication; experiment; greenwashing; legitimacy theory; signalling theory; CORPORATE; PERFORMANCE; LEGITIMACY; TRUST; DISCLOSURE; COMPANIES; THREAT; CSR;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2373
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the first Earth Day in the 1970s, corporate environmental performance has increased dramatically, and cases of greenwashing have increased sharply. The term greenwash refers to a variety of different misleading communications that aim to form overly positive beliefs among stakeholders about a company's environmental practices. The growing number of corporate social responsibility claims, whether founded or not, creates difficulties for stakeholders in distinguishing between truly positive business performance and companies that only appear to embrace a model of sustainable development. In this context, through the lens of legitimacy and signalling theory, we intend to understand and assess the different influences that various types of misleading communications about environmental issues have on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and greenwashing. Stakeholder responses to an environmental scandal will also be assessed. The hypotheses tested through a four-for-two design experiment reveal that different levels of greenwashing have a significantly different influence on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and stakeholders' reactions to environmental scandals.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 421
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior [J].
Aggarwal, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :87-101
[2]  
Aji H.M., 2015, International Journal of Business and Information, V10, P433, DOI DOI 10.6702/IJBI.2015.10.4.2
[3]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[4]   A model for conducting experimental environmental accounting research [J].
Alewine, Hank C. .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2010, 1 (02) :256-291
[5]   How Corporate Social Responsibility Information Influences Stakeholders' Intentions [J].
Alniacik, Umit ;
Alniacik, Esra ;
Genc, Nurullah .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (04) :234-245
[6]   CSR and Environmental Responsibility: Motives and Pressures to Adopt Green Management Practices [J].
Babiak, Kathy ;
Trendafilova, Sylvia .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (01) :11-24
[7]   Does Greenwashing Pay Off? Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Actions and Environmental Legitimacy [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 144 (02) :363-379
[8]   A life history approach to perceptions of global climate change risk: young adults' experiences about impacts, causes, and solutions [J].
Besel, Richard D. ;
Burke, Krista ;
Christos, Vana .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2017, 20 (01) :61-75
[9]   From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World [J].
Bromley, Patricia ;
Powell, Walter W. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2012, 6 :483-530
[10]   Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk? [J].
Brunton, Margaret ;
Eweje, Gabriel ;
Taskin, Nazim .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (01) :31-48