The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes The Worst System, Except for All the Others

被引：4

作者：

Burke, James F. ^{[1
]}

Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. ^{[2
,3
]}

Ho, P. Michael ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI USA

[2] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, VA Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA

[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Michigan Ctr Hlth Analyt & Med Predict, Ann Arbor, MI USA

[4] VA Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Denver, CO USA

[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver, CO USA

来源：

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 05期

关键词：

goals; peer review; research personnel; science;

D O I：

10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003853

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

引用

页数：2

共 4 条

[1]

Jefferson T, 1996, EDITORIAL PEER REV I

[2]

Research Information Network, ACTIVITIES COSTS FUN

Schroter, Sara ;

Black, Nick ;

Evans, Stephen ;

Godlee, Fiona ;

Osorio, Lyda ;

Smith, Richard .

[4] The trouble with medical journals [J].

Smith, R .