The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes The Worst System, Except for All the Others

被引:4
作者
Burke, James F. [1 ]
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. [2 ,3 ]
Ho, P. Michael [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, VA Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Michigan Ctr Hlth Analyt & Med Predict, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] VA Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver, CO USA
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
goals; peer review; research personnel; science;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003853
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Jefferson T, 1996, EDITORIAL PEER REV I
  • [2] Research Information Network, ACTIVITIES COSTS FUN
  • [3] What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
    Schroter, Sara
    Black, Nick
    Evans, Stephen
    Godlee, Fiona
    Osorio, Lyda
    Smith, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2008, 101 (10) : 507 - 514
  • [4] The trouble with medical journals
    Smith, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2006, 99 (03) : 115 - 119