Frequency of Expulsion of Post-Placental Intrauterine Device

被引：0
作者：
Anwar, Shaista Bashir [1 ]
Shams, Nabila [2 ]
Kalavanti [3 ]
Yasmeen, Haleema [4 ]
Agha, Sahira [5 ]
机构：
[1] Creek Gen Hosp, Gynae & Obs, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Patel Hosp, Gynae & Obs, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] Kharadar Gen Hosp, Gynae & Obs, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Jinnah Postgrad Med Ctr JPMC, Gynae & Obs, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Medicare Cardiac & Gen Hosp, Gynae & Obs, Karachi, Pakistan
来源：
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2020年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词：
Family planning; Intrauterine contraceptive device; Expulsion rate; RISK-FACTORS; INSERTION;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Objective: To determine the frequency to expulsion of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device in women delivering in a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Cross sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Patel Hospital, Karachi from 1st July 2018 to 31st December 2018. Methodology: Two hundred and eighty one women with intrauterine contraceptive device placed at the time of delivery were included in this study. Brief history was taken about intrauterine contraceptive device status at the end of 6 weeks. If there was any history of expulsion then ultrasound was done and absence of intrauterine contraceptive device on ultrasound was labeled as expulsion positive. Results: Rate of expulsion of post placental intra uterine contraceptive device in women was 15.3 percent. Conclusion: The evidence from this study suggests that immediate post placental intrauterine contraceptive device is an effective, useful, safe, convenient and low-cost procedure for the purpose of family planning.
引用
收藏
页码：1492 / 1494
页数：3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, COCHRANE DATABASESYS, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.PUB2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, FAM PLANN CAN RED HI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, CONTRACEPTION, V83, P102
  • [4] Malpositioned Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Future Pregnancies
    Braaten, Kari P.
    Benson, Carol B.
    Maurer, Rie
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (05) : 1014 - 1020
  • [5] Casey Frances E, 2020, CONTRACEPTION DRUGS
  • [6] Does an intraabdominally placed LNG-IUS have an adverse effect on fertility? a case report
    Doris, Nadine
    Shabib, Gihad
    Corbett, Shannon
    Leader, Arthur
    Black, Amanda
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [7] A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device
    Hayes, Jennifer L.
    Cwiak, Carrie
    Goedken, Peggy
    Zieman, Miriam
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (04) : 292 - 296
  • [8] Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment
    Kaislasuo, Janina
    Suhonen, Satu
    Gissler, Mika
    Lahteenmaki, Pekka
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (06) : 1546 - 1551
  • [9] Estimating progress towards meeting women's contraceptive needs in 185 countries: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling study
    Kantorova, Vladimira
    Wheldon, Mark C.
    Ueffing, Philipp
    Dasgupta, Aisha N. Z.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (02)
  • [10] Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion
    Madden, Tessa
    McNicholas, Colleen
    Zhao, Qiuhong
    Secura, Gina M.
    Eisenberg, David L.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (04) : 718 - 726
12