Detection of orbital foreign bodies by CT: Are plain radiographs useful?

被引:7
|
作者
Trommer, G [1 ]
Kosling, S [1 ]
Nerkelun, S [1 ]
Gosch, D [1 ]
Kloppel, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LEIPZIG, KLIN & POLIKLIN AUGENHEILKUNDE, D-04103 LEIPZIG, GERMANY
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1997年 / 166卷 / 06期
关键词
orbital; injury; foreign body; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1015464
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prove the visualisation of orbital foreign bodies by CT. Materials and methods: In vitro we examined defined small objects of various materials (metal, wood, glass, stone) which are common as orbital foreign bodies. Density and minimum detectable size were studied. The findings of 27 patients with suspected orbital foreign bodies were compared with the results of plain radiographs, Comberg radiographs, sonography, and surgery. Results: For iron, the minimum detectable size was 0.02 mm(3). A differentiation of various materials by CT was not always possible, especially in small objects. There were wide differences in density of wood (-600 HU to +130 HU) according to hardness and water content. The CT scans correctly showed number and location of foreign bodies. Other methods were inferior in detection of foreign bodies. Conclusion: In diagnosis of foreign body injuries of the orbit, CT is the imaging method of choice.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 492
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of ultrasound in detection of radiolucent foreign bodies in extremities
    Tantray, Mehraj D.
    Rather, Asim
    Manaan, Qazi
    Andleeb, Irfan
    Mohammad, Mir
    Gull, Yasmeena
    STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2018, 13 (02): : 81 - 85
  • [42] Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs for detection of medial-wall perforation secondary to osteolysis
    Walde, TA
    Mohan, V
    Leung, S
    Engh, CA
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [43] Implementation of a miniaturised navigation system in head and neck surgery for the detection and removal of foreign bodies
    Lorenz, K. J.
    Boeckers, A.
    Fassnacht, U.
    Wilde, F.
    Wegener, M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (01) : 553 - 559
  • [44] Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography
    Aras, M. H.
    Miloglu, O.
    Barutcugil, C.
    Kantarci, M.
    Ozcan, E.
    Harorli, A.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (02) : 72 - 78
  • [45] Comparison of extra-articular radiographic parameters of distal radius fractures on plain radiographs and CT scans
    Kramer, Simon B.
    Selles, Caroline A.
    Bakker, Daniel
    Schep, Niels W. L.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [46] The Accuracy of Ocular Sonography in Detection and Measurement of Intraocular Foreign Bodies
    Farvardin, Mohsen
    Mehryar, Morsal
    Karanjam, Mohammad-A
    Ashraf, Hossein
    Mehdizadeh, Morteza
    Rahimi, Mansoor
    Hosseini, Hamid
    Siyoofi, Sirus
    Mosallaei, Mahnaz
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 20 (04): : 20 - 23
  • [47] Sonographic detection of ingested foreign bodies in the inferior vena cava
    Rioux, M
    Lacourciere, L
    Langis, P
    Rouleau, M
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1997, 22 (01): : 108 - 110
  • [48] Accuracy of detecting burst of the lateral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures with plain radiographs: Is postoperative CT necessary?
    Jia, Xiaoyang
    Qiang, Minfei
    Zhang, Kun
    Han, Qinghui
    Jia, Gengxin
    Shi, Tianhao
    Wu, Ying
    Chen, Yanxi
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [49] CT IN PENETRATING CRANIOCERVICAL INJURY BY WOODEN FOREIGN-BODIES - REMINDER OF A PITFALL
    GINSBERG, LE
    WILLIAMS, DW
    MATHEWS, VP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1993, 14 (04) : 892 - 895
  • [50] CT evaluation of self-induced and retained foreign bodies in the abdomen and pelvis
    Lugo-Fagundo, Carolina
    Ghodasara, Nevil
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    Azadi, Javad R.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 : 26 - 35