Electron and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in the conservative treatment of stage I-II breast cancer -: First results of the randomized Budapest boost trial

被引:0
|
作者
Polgár, C
Fodor, J
Orosz, Z
Major, T
Takácsi-Nagy, Z
Mangel, LC
Sulyok, Z
Somogyi, A
Kásler, M
Németh, G
机构
[1] Natl Inst Oncol, Dept Radiotherapy, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Natl Inst Oncol, Ctr Expt & Human Tumor Pathol, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Natl Inst Oncol, Dept Gen & Thorac Surg, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Semmelweis Univ, Chair Oncol, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; boost irradiation; electron; brachytherapy; local recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-002-1053-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Alms: To evaluate the effect of electron and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) boost on Local tumor control (LTC), side effects and cosmesis after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in a prospective randomized study. Patients and Methods: 207 women with stage I-II breast cancer who underwent BCS were treated by 50 Gy irradiation to the whole breast and then randomly assigned to receive either a boost to the tumor bed (n = 104) or no further radiotherapy (n = 103). Boost treatments consisted of either 16 Gy electron irradiation (n = 52) or 12-14.25 Gy HDR BT (n = 52). Breast cancer-related events, side effects, and cosmetic results were assessed. Results: At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the crude rate of local recurrence was 6.7% (7/104) with and 15.5% (16/103) without boost. The 5-year probability of LTC, relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 92.7% vs 84.9% (p = 0.049), 76.6% vs 66.2% (p = 0.044), and 90.4% vs 82.1% (p = 0.053), respectively. There was no significant difference in LTC between patients treated with electron or HDR BT boost (94.2% vs 91.4%; p = 0.74). On multivariate analysis, patient age < 40 years (RR: 4.53), positive margin status (RR: 4.17), and high mitotic activity index (RR: 3.60) were found to be significant risk factors for local recurrence. The incidence of grade 2-3 side effects was higher in the boost arm (17.3% vs 7.8%; p = 0.03). However, the rate of excellent/good cosmetic results was similar for the two arms (85.6% vs 91.3%; p = 0.14). Cosmesis was rated as excellent/good in 88.5% of patients treated with HDR BT and 82.7% of patients with electron boost (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Boost dose significantly improves LTC and RFS in patients treated with BCS and radiotherapy. In spite of the higher incidence of late side effects in the boost arm, boost dose is strongly recommended for patients at high risk for Local recurrence. Positive or close margin status, high mitotic activity index, and young patient age should be viewed as absolute indications for tumor bed boost. LTC and cosmesis are excellent and similar to patients boosted with either HDR BT or electrons.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 623
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biological dose summation of external beam radiotherapy for the whole breast and image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost in early-stage breast cancer
    Frohlich, Georgina
    Meszaros, Norbert
    Smanyko, Viktor
    Polgar, Csaba
    Major, Tibor
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (05) : 462 - 469
  • [22] Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a boost in synchronous prostate and rectal cancer treatment: case report and literature review
    Konat-Baska, Katarzyna
    Chichel, Adam
    Staszek-Szewczyk, Urszula
    Maciejczyk, Adam
    Matkowski, Rafal
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [23] High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
    Yoshioka, Y
    Nose, T
    Yoshida, K
    Inoue, T
    Yamazaki, H
    Tanaka, E
    Shiomi, H
    Imai, A
    Nakamura, S
    Shimamoto, S
    Inoue, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (03): : 675 - 681
  • [24] Concomitant cervical and transperineal parametrial high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Bailleux, Caroline
    Falk, Alexander Tuan
    Chand-Fouche, Marie-Eve
    Gautier, Mathieu
    Barranger, Emmanuel
    Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [25] Predictors of poor cosmesis in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost after breast conservation surgery
    Feizi, Nasim
    Arvandi, Shole
    Feli, Maryam
    Mohammadian, Fatemeh
    Zahiri, Ziba
    Shamsi, Azin
    Bagheri, Ali
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (05) : 429 - 437
  • [26] Evaluation of tolerance and toxicity of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost combined with interstitial hyperthermia for prostate cancer
    Kukielka, Andrzej Marek
    Hetnal, Marcin
    Bereza, Krzysztof
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2016, 32 (03) : 324 - 330
  • [27] Locoregional recurrences after conservative treatment of breast cancer stage I-II
    Raspall, MJF
    Serra, EP
    Verdum, JI
    Muñoz, CA
    González, BO
    Gómez, AG
    Ollé, AL
    Pires, DD
    Puertas, EL
    de Grignon, JCBL
    López, AL
    Folch, MT
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2002, 118 (05): : 161 - 165
  • [28] INTERSTITIAL HYPERTHERMIA AND HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ANAL CANCER - A PHASE I/II STUDY
    KAPP, KS
    KAPP, DS
    STUECKLSCHWEIGER, G
    BERGER, A
    GEYER, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (01): : 189 - 199
  • [29] Acute Toxicity of High-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy With the MammoSite Applicator in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Gregory M. Richards
    Anthony M. Berson
    John Rescigno
    Seema Sanghavi
    Beth Siegel
    Deborah Axelrod
    Stephanie Bernik
    Vincent Scarpinato
    Christopher Mills
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : 739 - 746
  • [30] Acute toxicity of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy with the MarnmoSite applicator in patients with early-stage breast cancer
    Richards, GM
    Berson, AM
    Rescigno, J
    Sanghavi, S
    Siegel, B
    Axelrod, D
    Bernik, S
    Scarpinato, V
    Mills, C
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) : 739 - 746