Electron and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in the conservative treatment of stage I-II breast cancer -: First results of the randomized Budapest boost trial

被引:0
|
作者
Polgár, C
Fodor, J
Orosz, Z
Major, T
Takácsi-Nagy, Z
Mangel, LC
Sulyok, Z
Somogyi, A
Kásler, M
Németh, G
机构
[1] Natl Inst Oncol, Dept Radiotherapy, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Natl Inst Oncol, Ctr Expt & Human Tumor Pathol, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Natl Inst Oncol, Dept Gen & Thorac Surg, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Semmelweis Univ, Chair Oncol, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; boost irradiation; electron; brachytherapy; local recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-002-1053-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Alms: To evaluate the effect of electron and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) boost on Local tumor control (LTC), side effects and cosmesis after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in a prospective randomized study. Patients and Methods: 207 women with stage I-II breast cancer who underwent BCS were treated by 50 Gy irradiation to the whole breast and then randomly assigned to receive either a boost to the tumor bed (n = 104) or no further radiotherapy (n = 103). Boost treatments consisted of either 16 Gy electron irradiation (n = 52) or 12-14.25 Gy HDR BT (n = 52). Breast cancer-related events, side effects, and cosmetic results were assessed. Results: At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the crude rate of local recurrence was 6.7% (7/104) with and 15.5% (16/103) without boost. The 5-year probability of LTC, relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 92.7% vs 84.9% (p = 0.049), 76.6% vs 66.2% (p = 0.044), and 90.4% vs 82.1% (p = 0.053), respectively. There was no significant difference in LTC between patients treated with electron or HDR BT boost (94.2% vs 91.4%; p = 0.74). On multivariate analysis, patient age < 40 years (RR: 4.53), positive margin status (RR: 4.17), and high mitotic activity index (RR: 3.60) were found to be significant risk factors for local recurrence. The incidence of grade 2-3 side effects was higher in the boost arm (17.3% vs 7.8%; p = 0.03). However, the rate of excellent/good cosmetic results was similar for the two arms (85.6% vs 91.3%; p = 0.14). Cosmesis was rated as excellent/good in 88.5% of patients treated with HDR BT and 82.7% of patients with electron boost (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Boost dose significantly improves LTC and RFS in patients treated with BCS and radiotherapy. In spite of the higher incidence of late side effects in the boost arm, boost dose is strongly recommended for patients at high risk for Local recurrence. Positive or close margin status, high mitotic activity index, and young patient age should be viewed as absolute indications for tumor bed boost. LTC and cosmesis are excellent and similar to patients boosted with either HDR BT or electrons.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 623
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electron and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in the Conservative Treatment of Stage I–II Breast Cancer First Results of the Randomized Budapest Boost TrialElektonen- und High-Dose-Rate-Brachytherapie-Boost bei brusterhaltender Therapie des Mammakarzinoms im Stadium I–II. Erste Ergebnisse der randomisierten Budapester Boost-Studie
    Csaba Polgár
    János Fodor
    Zsolt Orosz
    Tibor Major
    Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy
    László Csaba Mangel
    Zoltán Sulyok
    András Somogyi
    Miklós Kásler
    György Németh
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2002, 178 (11) : 615 - 623
  • [2] Early-stage breast cancer conservative treatment: high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a single fraction of 700 cGy to the tumour bed
    Rodriguez Perez, Aurora
    Samper Ots, Pilar Maria
    Lopez Carrizosa, Maria Concepcion
    Perez-Regadera Gomez, Jose Fermin
    Zapatero Ortuno, Jose
    Saez Garrido, Juan de Dios
    Martin de Miguel, Manuel Joaquin
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (05): : 362 - 368
  • [3] Early-stage breast cancer conservative treatment: high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a single fraction of 700 cGy to the tumour bed
    Aurora Rodríguez Pérez
    Pilar María Samper Ots
    María Concepción López Carrizosa
    José Fermín Pérez-Regadera Gómez
    José Zapatero Ortuño
    Juan de Dios Sáez Garrido
    Manuel Joaquín Martín de Miguel
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2012, 14 : 362 - 368
  • [4] High-dose irradiation for prostate cancer via a high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: Results of a phase I to II study
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    Martinez, Alvaro A.
    Boike, Thomas P.
    Spencer, William
    Goldstein, Neal
    Gustafson, Gary S.
    Krauss, Daniel J.
    Gonzalez, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (02): : 416 - 423
  • [5] Breast-conservative surgery with close or positive margins:: Can the breast be preserved with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost?
    Luis Guinot, Jose
    Roldan, Susana
    Maronas, Maria
    Tortajada, Isabel
    Carrascosa, Maria
    Chust, Maria Luisa
    Estornell, Marian
    Mengual, Jose Luis
    Arribas, Leoncio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (05): : 1381 - 1387
  • [6] Perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for patients with early breast cancer
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Rath, Goura Kisor
    Shukla, Nootan Kumar
    Thulkar, Sanjay
    Madan, Renu
    Julka, Pramod Kumar
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2013, 99 (05): : 604 - 610
  • [7] Phase I-II trial of perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer
    Martinez-Monge, Rafael
    Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso
    Cambeiro, Mauricio
    Garran, Cristina
    Montesdeoca, Nestor
    Aristu, Jose Javier
    Alcalde, Juan
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [8] High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Outcomes and genitourinary toxicity
    Bece, Andrej
    Patanjali, Nitya
    Jackson, Michael
    Whitaker, May
    Hruby, George
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (05) : 670 - 676
  • [9] A prospective dose escalation trial of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Evidence of hypofractionation efficacy?
    Tang, Johann I.
    Williams, Scott G.
    Tai, Keen Hun
    Dean, Joanne
    Duchesne, Gillian M.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2006, 5 (04) : 256 - 261
  • [10] Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial
    Immink, J. M.
    Putter, H.
    Bartelink, H.
    Cardoso, J. S.
    Cardoso, M. J.
    van der Hulst-Vijgen, M. H. V.
    Noordijk, E. M.
    Poortmans, P. M.
    Rodenhuis, C. C.
    Struikmans, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (10) : 2591 - 2598