Systematic review and meta-analysis: D-Penicillamine vs. placebo/no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis - Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

被引:14
作者
Gong, Y. [1 ]
Klingenberg, S. L. [1 ]
Gluud, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, HS Rigshosp, Cochrane HepatoBiliary Grp,Dept 7102, Copenhagen Trial Unit,Ctr Clin Intervent Res, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03164.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background D-Penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its ability to decrease hepatic copper and modulate the immune response. The results on effects of D-penicillamine in randomized-clinical trials of primary biliary cirrhosis patients are inconsistent. Aim To systematically evaluate the benefits and harms of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Methods We have performed a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized-clinical trials to evaluate the effects of D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis. The primary outcomes are mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. We analysed the data by fixed-effect and random-effect models. Results Seven randomized trials including 706 patients were analysed. D-Penicillamine was without significant effects on mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.82-1.43, P=0.56), mortality or liver transplantation (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.68, P=0.62), pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage and liver biochemical variables. D-Penicillamine significantly decreased serum alanine aminotransferase activity (weighted mean difference)-45 IU/L, 95% CI:-75 to -15, P < 0.05) and led to significantly more adverse events (RR 4.18, 95% CI: 1.38-12.69, P=0.01). Conclusion D-Penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or morbidity, and led to more adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1535 / 1544
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[2]  
BASSENDINE MF, 1982, GUT, V23, pA909
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]   A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-TRIAL OF D-PENICILLAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY BILIARY-CIRRHOSIS [J].
BODENHEIMER, HC ;
SCHAFFNER, F ;
STERNLIEB, I ;
KLION, FM ;
VERNACE, S ;
PEZZULLO, J .
HEPATOLOGY, 1985, 5 (06) :1139-1142
[5]  
Deeks J.J., 2008, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context, Second Edition, P285
[6]   METHODS FOR COMBINING RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS - STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS [J].
DEMETS, DL .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (03) :341-350
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]   TRIAL OF PENICILLAMINE IN ADVANCED PRIMARY BILIARY-CIRRHOSIS [J].
DICKSON, ER ;
FLEMING, TR ;
WIESNER, RH ;
BALDUS, WP ;
FLEMING, CR ;
LUDWIG, J ;
MCCALL, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (16) :1011-1015
[9]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[10]  
EPSTEIN O, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1275