Current trends in flow cytometry automated data analysis software

被引:62
作者
Cheung, Melissa [1 ]
Campbell, Jonathan J. [2 ]
Whitby, Liam [3 ]
Thomas, Robert J. [1 ]
Braybrook, Julian [2 ]
Petzing, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Ctr Biol Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England
[2] Natl Measurement Lab LGC, Teddington, Middx, England
[3] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
automation; cell therapy; data analysis; flow cytometry; gating; software; RARE CELL-POPULATIONS; MASS CYTOMETRY; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; DISCOVERY; SUBSETS; STANDARDIZATION; VISUALIZATION; PROGRESSION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.a.24320
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Automated flow cytometry (FC) data analysis tools for cell population identification and characterization are increasingly being used in academic, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and clinical laboratories. The development of these computational methods is designed to overcome reproducibility and process bottleneck issues in manual gating, however, the take-up of these tools remains (anecdotally) low. Here, we performed a comprehensive literature survey of state-of-the-art computational tools typically published by research, clinical, and biomanufacturing laboratories for automated FC data analysis and identified popular tools based on literature citation counts. Dimensionality reduction methods ranked highly, such as generic t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and its initial Matlab-based implementation for cytometry data viSNE. Software with graphical user interfaces also ranked highly, including PhenoGraph, SPADE1, FlowSOM, and Citrus, with unsupervised learning methods outnumbering supervised learning methods, and algorithm type popularity spread across K-Means, hierarchical, density-based, model-based, and other classes of clustering algorithms. Additionally, to illustrate the actual use typically within clinical spaces alongside frequent citations, a survey issued by UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping to identify software usage trends among clinical laboratories was completed. The survey revealed 53% of laboratories have not yet taken up automated cell population identification methods, though among those that have, Infinicyt software is the most frequently identified. Survey respondents considered data output quality to be the most important factor when using automated FC data analysis software, followed by software speed and level of technical support. This review found differences in software usage between biomedical institutions, with tools for discovery, data exploration, and visualization more popular in academia, whereas automated tools for specialized targeted analysis that apply supervised learning methods were more used in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1021
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Predicting Cell Populations in Single Cell Mass Cytometry Data [J].
Abdelaal, Tamim ;
van Unen, Vincent ;
Hollt, Thomas ;
Koning, Frits ;
Reinders, Marcel J. T. ;
Mahfouz, Ahmed .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2019, 95A (07) :769-781
[2]   A benchmark for evaluation of algorithms for identification of cellular correlates of clinical outcomes [J].
Aghaeepour, Nima ;
Chattopadhyay, Pratip ;
Chikina, Maria ;
Dhaene, Tom ;
Van Gassen, Sofie ;
Kursa, Miron ;
Lambrecht, Bart N. ;
Malek, Mehrnoush ;
McLachlan, G. J. ;
Qian, Yu ;
Qiu, Peng ;
Saeys, Yvan ;
Stanton, Rick ;
Tong, Dong ;
Vens, Celine ;
Walkowiak, Slawomir ;
Wang, Kui ;
Finak, Greg ;
Gottardo, Raphael ;
Mosmann, Tim ;
Nolan, Garry P. ;
Scheuermann, Richard H. ;
Brinkman, Ryan R. .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2016, 89A (01) :16-21
[3]  
Aghaeepour N, 2013, NAT METHODS, V10, P228, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.2365, 10.1038/nmeth.2365]
[4]   Rapid Cell Population Identification in Flow Cytometry Data [J].
Aghaeepour, Nima ;
Nikolic, Radina ;
Hoos, Holger H. ;
Brinkman, Ryan R. .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2011, 79A (01) :6-13
[5]   viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia [J].
Amir, El-ad David ;
Davis, Kara L. ;
Tadmor, Michelle D. ;
Simonds, Erin F. ;
Levine, Jacob H. ;
Bendall, Sean C. ;
Shenfeld, Daniel K. ;
Krishnaswamy, Smita ;
Nolan, Garry P. ;
Pe'er, Dana .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) :545-+
[6]   CCAST: A Model-Based Gating Strategy to Isolate Homogeneous Subpopulations in a Heterogeneous Population of Single Cells [J].
Anchang, Benedict ;
Do, Mary T. ;
Zhao, Xi ;
Plevritis, Sylvia K. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (07)
[7]  
Ankerst M, 1999, SIGMOD RECORD, VOL 28, NO 2 - JUNE 1999, P49
[8]   An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale [J].
Bangor, Aaron ;
Kortum, Philip T. ;
Miller, James T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) :574-594
[9]  
Bashashati Ali., 2009, Advances in Bioinformatics, V2009, P1, DOI DOI 10.1155/2009/584603
[10]   High-dimensional analysis of the murine myeloid cell system [J].
Becher, Burkhard ;
Schlitzer, Andreas ;
Chen, Jinmiao ;
Mair, Florian ;
Sumatoh, Hermi R. ;
Teng, Karen Wei Weng ;
Low, Donovan ;
Ruedl, Christiane ;
Riccardi-Castagnoli, Paola ;
Poidinger, Michael ;
Greter, Melanie ;
Ginhoux, Florent ;
Newell, Evan W. .
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 15 (12) :1181-1189