Current trends in flow cytometry automated data analysis software

被引:56
|
作者
Cheung, Melissa [1 ]
Campbell, Jonathan J. [2 ]
Whitby, Liam [3 ]
Thomas, Robert J. [1 ]
Braybrook, Julian [2 ]
Petzing, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Ctr Biol Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England
[2] Natl Measurement Lab LGC, Teddington, Middx, England
[3] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
automation; cell therapy; data analysis; flow cytometry; gating; software; RARE CELL-POPULATIONS; MASS CYTOMETRY; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; DISCOVERY; SUBSETS; STANDARDIZATION; VISUALIZATION; PROGRESSION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.a.24320
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Automated flow cytometry (FC) data analysis tools for cell population identification and characterization are increasingly being used in academic, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and clinical laboratories. The development of these computational methods is designed to overcome reproducibility and process bottleneck issues in manual gating, however, the take-up of these tools remains (anecdotally) low. Here, we performed a comprehensive literature survey of state-of-the-art computational tools typically published by research, clinical, and biomanufacturing laboratories for automated FC data analysis and identified popular tools based on literature citation counts. Dimensionality reduction methods ranked highly, such as generic t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and its initial Matlab-based implementation for cytometry data viSNE. Software with graphical user interfaces also ranked highly, including PhenoGraph, SPADE1, FlowSOM, and Citrus, with unsupervised learning methods outnumbering supervised learning methods, and algorithm type popularity spread across K-Means, hierarchical, density-based, model-based, and other classes of clustering algorithms. Additionally, to illustrate the actual use typically within clinical spaces alongside frequent citations, a survey issued by UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping to identify software usage trends among clinical laboratories was completed. The survey revealed 53% of laboratories have not yet taken up automated cell population identification methods, though among those that have, Infinicyt software is the most frequently identified. Survey respondents considered data output quality to be the most important factor when using automated FC data analysis software, followed by software speed and level of technical support. This review found differences in software usage between biomedical institutions, with tools for discovery, data exploration, and visualization more popular in academia, whereas automated tools for specialized targeted analysis that apply supervised learning methods were more used in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1021
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Attractors™ software for automated analysis of cytokine flow cytometry data
    Ghanekar, SA
    Suni, MA
    Maino, VC
    CYTOMETRY, 2002, : 101 - 101
  • [2] Benchmarking automated flow cytometry data analysis software using synthetic datasets
    Cheung, M.
    Campbell, J. J.
    Braybrook, J.
    Thomas, R.
    Petzing, J.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2020, 22 (05) : S38 - S39
  • [3] Automated analysis of flow cytometry data comes of age
    Brinkman, Ryan R.
    Aghaeepour, Nima
    Finak, Greg
    Gottardo, Raphael
    Mosmann, Tim
    Scheuermann, Richard H.
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2016, 89A (01) : 13 - 15
  • [4] Automated analysis of bacterial flow cytometry data with FlowGateNIST
    Ross, David
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [5] Automated analysis in flow cytometry
    Cualing, HD
    CYTOMETRY, 2000, 42 (02): : 110 - 113
  • [6] Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
    Nima Aghaeepour
    Greg Finak
    Holger Hoos
    Tim R Mosmann
    Ryan Brinkman
    Raphael Gottardo
    Richard H Scheuermann
    Nature Methods, 2013, 10 (3) : 228 - 238
  • [7] A multidimensional classification approach for the automated analysis of flow cytometry data
    Pedreira, Carlos Eduardo
    Costa, Elaine S.
    Arroyo, M. Elena
    Allmeida, Julia
    Orfao, Alberto
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 55 (03) : 1155 - 1162
  • [8] High throughput automated analysis of big flow cytometry data
    Rahim, Albina
    Meskas, Justin
    Drissler, Sibyl
    Yue, Alice
    Lorenc, Anna
    Laing, Adam
    Saran, Namita
    White, Jacqui
    Abeler-Dorner, Lucie
    Hayday, Adrian
    Brinkman, Ryan R.
    METHODS, 2018, 134 : 164 - 176
  • [9] Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
    Aghaeepour, Nima
    Finak, Greg
    Hoos, Holger
    Mosmann, Tim R.
    Brinkman, Ryan
    Gottardo, Raphael
    Scheuermann, Richard H.
    NATURE METHODS, 2013, 10 (03) : 228 - 238
  • [10] Optimizing transformations for automated, high throughput analysis of flow cytometry data
    Greg Finak
    Juan-Manuel Perez
    Andrew Weng
    Raphael Gottardo
    BMC Bioinformatics, 11