Managing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Together: The Effects of Stakeholder Participation and Third-Party Organization (TPO) Endorsement on CSR Initiative Effectiveness

被引:11
作者
Beldad, Ardion D. [1 ]
Seijdel, Colin T. [1 ]
de Jong, Menno D. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Dept Commun Sci, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Stakeholder participation; Third-party organization endorsement; Perceived CSR motives; Skepticism; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; ATTRIBUTIONS; INFORMATION; SKEPTICISM; REPUTATION; RESPOND; TRUST;
D O I
10.1057/s41299-019-00082-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Engaging in strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives is one of the strategies firms employ to positively influence stakeholder perceptions and induce desirable business outcomes. However, merely employing CSR initiatives may not always guarantee success, as poorly executed and inadequately managed CSR initiatives might be counterproductive for a company and even inhibit that company from reaping those initiatives' benefits. The CSR literature claims that stakeholder participation and third-party organization (TPO) endorsements are effective CSR management approaches, yet little scholarly attention has been given to their effects on customers' attitudes and intentions. To address the question pertaining to the impact of participation strategies (information, response, involvement) and third-party endorsement on CSR effectiveness determinants (perceived motives and skepticism) and customers' intention to engage in a company's CSR initiative, a 3 x 2 between-respondents factorial experiment with 213 Dutch health insurance clients was implemented. Results indicate that only stakeholder participation positively influences individuals' intention to engage with the initiative, and that this effect is mediated by perceptions of CSR motives and low levels of skepticism.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 240
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]   Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting [J].
Cadinu, MR ;
Rothbart, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (04) :661-677
[12]   The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice [J].
Carroll, Archie B. ;
Shabana, Kareem M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (01) :85-105
[13]   Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Connors, Scott ;
Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ;
Thomson, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 145 (03) :599-621
[14]  
Crane A., 2003, Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue
[15]  
Daneshvary R, 2000, J CONSUM MARK, V17, P203, DOI 10.1108/07363760010328987
[16]   Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services [J].
de los Salmones, MDG ;
Crespo, AH ;
del Bosque, IR .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 61 (04) :369-385
[17]  
Dean DH, 1999, J ADVERTISING, V28, P1
[18]   Third-party organization endorsement of products: An advertising cue affecting consumer prepurchase evaluation of goods and services [J].
Dean, DH ;
Biswas, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2001, 30 (04) :41-57
[19]   Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility? The Role of Institutions, Information, and Legitimacy [J].
Doh, Jonathan P. ;
Howton, Shawn D. ;
Howton, Shelly W. ;
Siegel, Donald S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (06) :1461-1485
[20]   Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning [J].
Du, Shuili ;
Bhattacharya, C. B. ;
Sen, Sankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2007, 24 (03) :224-241