First-Line Boosted Protease Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Treatment-Naive HIV-1-Infected Patients - Making a Good Thing Better

被引:0
作者
Llibre, Josep M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Lluita SIDA Fdn, Badalona 08916, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Protease inhibitors; HIV-1; Initial therapy; Darunavir; Atazanavir; ONCE-DAILY DARUNAVIR/RITONAVIR; DAILY LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR; 2008; RECOMMENDATIONS; LOPINAVIR-RITONAVIR; DARUNAVIR-RITONAVIR; INITIAL TREATMENT; DRUG-RESISTANCE; HIV-1; INFECTION; GLUCOSE-UPTAKE; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Lopinavir/ritonavir has been the recommended boosted protease inhibitor for treatment-naive individuals in all guidelines since its approval in the year 2000. More recently, the rest of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (namely lopinavir once-daily, fosamprenavir, saquinavir, atazanavir, and darunavir) have demonstrated non-inferior antiviral efficacy at 48 weeks than lopinavir twice-daily. Overall, all ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors display a high genetic and pharmacological barrier to resistance development and protect the rest of the drugs on board in the regimen, achieving similar CD4 count gains among them. During the last year, studies conducted with atazanavir and darunavir have demonstrated superior virologic efficacy against lopinavir at 96 weeks in their pivotal trials. These two protease inhibitors provide significant improvements in triglycerides and gastrointestinal toxicity, together with simpler once-daily formulations, compared to lopinavir. In the case of atazanavir, this is mainly driven by a lower rate of discontinuations due to drug-related side effects, as pure antiviral efficacy is essentially similar to lopinavir. Furthermore, the gastrointestinal intolerance of lopinavir is actually compensated by an increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia and jaundice with atazanavir, but this is more a cosmetic problem and rarely a cause of drug withdrawal. Darunavir has been licensed to be taken once-daily in treatment-naive patients, and shows significantly better lipid and gastrointestinal tolerance than lopinavir. Robust sensitivity analysis with darunavir prove superior antiviral efficacy than lopinavir at 96 weeks also when non-virologic failures (toxicity and discontinuations) are censored, or when only patients receiving lopinavir twice-daily are included in the estimation. Moreover, darunavir has shown superior antiviral efficacy than lopinavir, particularly in three situations of particular clinical concern: high baseline viral load, low baseline CD4 counts, and suboptimal drug adherence. Over the last years, the treatment landscape with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors as initial HIV therapy has accomplished significant advances, with improved degrees of efficacy, tolerability, and convenience, that should be used to guide treatment choice in first-line antiretroviral therapy. (AIDS Rev. 2009;11:215-22)
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] ARATHOON E, 2008, 15 INT AIDS C MEX CI
  • [2] ARRIBAS JR, 2009, P 5 INT AIDS C CAP T
  • [3] BARALDI E, 2009, 5 IAS C HIV PATH TRE
  • [4] Bartlett JA, 2006, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V41, P323
  • [5] Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once-Daily in Treatment-Naive and -Experienced Patients
    Boffito, Marta
    Miralles, Diego
    Hill, Andrew
    [J]. HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 9 (06): : 418 - 427
  • [6] *CDCP, 1998, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V47, P43
  • [7] Atazanavir-associated nephrolithiasis: cases from the US food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system
    Chan-Tack, Kirk M.
    Truffa, Melissa M.
    Struble, Kimberly A.
    Birnkrant, Debra B.
    [J]. AIDS, 2007, 21 (09) : 1215 - 1218
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2:: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials
    Clotet, Bonaventura
    Bellos, Nicholas
    Molina, Jean-Michel
    Cooper, David
    Goffard, Jean-Chrostophe
    Lazzarin, Adriano
    Woehrmann, Andrej
    Katlama, Christine
    Wilkin, Timothy
    Haubrich, Richard
    Cohen, Calvin
    Farthing, Charles
    Jayaweera, Dushyantha
    Markowitz, Martin
    Ruane, Peter
    Spinosa-Guzman, Sabrina
    Lefebvre, Eric
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9568) : 1169 - 1178
  • [9] The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacovir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial (vol 368, pg 476, 2006)
    Eron, Joseph, Jr.
    Yeni, Patrick
    Gathe, Joseph
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9543) : 1238 - 1238
  • [10] A Once-Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Regimen Is Noninferior to Twice-Daily Dosing and Results in Similar Safety and Tolerability in Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects Through 48 Weeks
    Gathe, Joseph
    da Silva, Barbara A.
    Cohen, Daniel E.
    Loutfy, Mona R.
    Podzamczer, Daniel
    Rubio, Rafael
    Gibbs, Sara
    Marsh, Theresa
    Naylor, Christian
    Fredrick, Linda
    Bernstein, Barry
    [J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2009, 50 (05) : 474 - 481