Economic assessment of neonatal intensive care

被引:51
作者
Cheah, Irene Guat Sim [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuala Lumpur Hosp, Paediat Inst, Dept Paediat, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur 50586, Malaysia
关键词
Costs; cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); preterm; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; PRETERM BIRTH; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH-CARE; BORDERLINE VIABILITY; GESTATIONAL-AGE; INFANTS; LIFE; CONSEQUENCES; PREMATURITY;
D O I
10.21037/tp.2019.07.03
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Most of the studies on the costing of neonatal intensive care has concentrated on the costs associated with preterm infants which takes up more than half of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) costs. The focus has been on determining the cost-effectiveness of extreme preterm infants and those at threshold of viability. While the costs of care have an inverse relationship with gestational age (GA) and the lifetime medical costs of the extreme preterm can be as high as $450,000, the total NICU expenditure are skewed towards the care of moderate and late preterm infants who form the main bulk of patients. Neonatal intensive care, has been found to be very cost-effective at $1,000 per term infant per QALY and $9,100 for extreme preterm survivor per QALY. For low and LMIC, where NICU resources are limited, the costs of NICU care is lower largely due to a patient profile of more term and preterm of greater GAs and correspondingly less intensity of care. Public health measures, neonatal resuscitation training, empowerment of nurses to do resuscitation, increasing the accessibility to essential newborn care are recommended cheaper cost-effective measures to reduce neonatal mortality in countries with high neonatal mortality rate, whilst upgraded neonatal intensive care services are needed to further reduce neonatal mortality rate once below 15 per 1,000 livebirths. Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care should also include post discharge costs which mainly fall on the health, social and educational sectors. Strategies to reduce neonatal intensive care costs could include more widespread implementation of cost-effective methods of improving neonatal outcome and reducing neonatal morbidities, including access to antenatal care, perinatal interventions to delay preterm delivery wherever feasible, improving maternal health status and practising cost saving and effective neonatal intensive care treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 256
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE J PEDIAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000065
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention
[4]   Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome [J].
Bahadue, Felicia L. ;
Soll, Roger .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (11)
[5]   Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions [J].
Barros, Fernando C. ;
Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed ;
Batra, Maneesh ;
Hansen, Thomas N. ;
Victora, Cesar G. ;
Rubens, Craig E. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2010, 10
[6]  
Bhat BV., 2015, INT J ADV MED HLTH R, V2, P1
[7]   Costs and cost-effectiveness of periviable care [J].
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Burchfield, David J. .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 38 (01) :56-62
[8]  
Cheah Irene Guat Sim, 2005, J Perinatol, V25, P47
[9]   Preterm birth-associated cost of early intervention services: An analysis by gestational age [J].
Clements, Karen M. ;
Barfield, Wanda D. ;
Ayadi, M. Femi ;
Wilber, Nancy .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (04) :E866-E874
[10]   The EPICure study: Outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability [J].
Costeloe, K ;
Hennessy, E ;
Gibson, AT ;
Marlow, N ;
Wilkinson, AR .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (04) :659-671