A comparative study of seismic performance of RC frames with masonry infills

被引:9
作者
Oinam, Romanbabu M. [1 ]
Sugumar, Ruban [1 ]
Sahoo, Dipti Ranjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
来源
PLASTICITY AND IMPACT MECHANICS | 2017年 / 173卷
关键词
Cyclic loading; Masonry; Reinforced concrete; Pinching; Non-linear static pushover; EARTHQUAKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.220
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, three geometrically similar frames, having different configurations of masonry infills, has been investigated. The frames have been modelled in OpenSees simulation platform, utilising material and section properties available in its library. This paper mainly focusses on studying the effect of masonry infills in the RC frames and its hysteretic response during an earthquake event, where it is expected to go into the non-linear range. Static non-linear cyclic pushover analysis has been carried out to predict the seismic performance of the study frames. A detailed discussion on the modelling, hysteretic response, lateral strength and ductility of the RC frames with masonry infills has been presented. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1784 / 1791
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Experimental and numerical study on seismic response of RC frames strengthened by shotcrete sandwich panel infills and CFRP strips
    Vetr, Mohammad Ghasem
    Yarmohamadi, Amir
    Mohammadikish, Saeideh
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 38 : 1244 - 1256
  • [12] A novel approach for the evaluation of the economical losses due to seismic actions on RC buildings with masonry infills
    Rossi, A.
    Morandi, P.
    Magenes, G.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 145
  • [13] Effectiveness of seismic repairing stages with CFRPs on the seismic performance of damaged RC frames
    Duran, Burak
    Tunaboyu, Onur
    Kaplan, Onur
    Avsar, Ozgur
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2018, 67 (03) : 233 - 244
  • [14] Quick Reparation of Infills in RC Frames After Seismic Damages - Experimental Tests on Shaking Table
    Rousakis, Theodoros
    Kwiecien, Arkadiusz
    Viskovic, Alberto
    Ilki, Alper
    Tiller, Petra
    Ghiassi, Bahman
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Gams, Matija
    Rakicevic, Zoran
    Halici, Omer Faruk
    Zajac, Boguslaw
    Hojdys, Lukasz
    Krajewski, Piotr
    Rizzo, Fabio
    Colla, Camilla
    Gabrielli, Elena
    Sapalidis, Anastasios
    Papadouli, Efthimia
    Vanian, Vachan
    Bogdanovic, Aleksandra
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRP COMPOSITES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (CICE 2020/2021), 2022, 198 : 1518 - 1530
  • [15] Numerical study of the seismic retrofitting of masonry-Infilled RC frames with openings using TRM
    Christiana, A. Filippou
    Kyriakides, Nicholas C.
    Chrysostomou, Christis Z.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (03) : 776 - 805
  • [16] Effect of introducing RC infill on seismic performance of damaged RC frames
    Turk, Ahmet Murat
    Ersoy, Ugur
    Ozcebe, Guney
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2006, 23 (05) : 469 - 486
  • [17] Behavior of concrete masonry infills bounded by masonry frames subjected to in-plane lateral loading - Experimental study
    Roosta, Soraya
    Liu, Yi
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 247
  • [18] Seismic performance of RC frames with EPSC latticed concrete infill walls
    Tang, Baizan
    Chen, Su
    Li, Xiaojun
    Xiong, Lihong
    Chen, Hua-Peng
    Feng, Qingsong
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 197
  • [19] Seismic performance improvement of infilled nonductile RC frames
    Korkmaz, S. Z.
    Kilic, A.
    Korkmaz, H. H.
    Kamanh, M.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 2062 - 2067
  • [20] A comparative study on the strengthening of RC frames
    Erdem, I
    Akyuz, U
    Ersoy, U
    Ozcebe, G
    SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, 2003, 29 : 407 - 432