The metaphysics of causal intervention

[21] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause (CONCLUDED) [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (05) : 471 - 539

[22] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause (CONTINUED) PART II [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (04) : 396 - 419

[23] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (03) : 229 - 259

[24] TRANSCENDENTAL NONSENSE AND THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH I. THE HEAVEN OF LEGAL CONCEPTS [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1935, 35 (06) : 809 - 849

[25] CAUSATION IN THE LAW - HART,HLA, HONORE,AM [J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1960, 58 (06) : 951 - 955

[26] DANCOHEN M, 1983, ENCY CRIME JUSTICE, V1, P162

[27] Davidson Donald, 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, P3

[28] DONAGAN A, 1977, THEORY MORALITY, P45

[29] DRESSLER J, 1987, UNDERSTANDING CRIMIN, P83

[30] EDGARTON HW, 1924, U PENN LAW REV, V72, P343, DOI DOI 10.2307/3314220

[21] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause (CONCLUDED) [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (05) : 471 - 539

[22] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause (CONTINUED) PART II [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (04) : 396 - 419

[23] Workable Rules For Determining Proximate Cause [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1932, 20 (03) : 229 - 259

[24] TRANSCENDENTAL NONSENSE AND THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH I. THE HEAVEN OF LEGAL CONCEPTS [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1935, 35 (06) : 809 - 849

[25] CAUSATION IN THE LAW - HART,HLA, HONORE,AM [J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1960, 58 (06) : 951 - 955

[26] DANCOHEN M, 1983, ENCY CRIME JUSTICE, V1, P162

[27] Davidson Donald, 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, P3

[28] DONAGAN A, 1977, THEORY MORALITY, P45

[29] DRESSLER J, 1987, UNDERSTANDING CRIMIN, P83

[30] EDGARTON HW, 1924, U PENN LAW REV, V72, P343, DOI DOI 10.2307/3314220