Static Bandwidth Allocation on Optical Networks

被引:0
作者
Lashkari, Arash Habibi [1 ]
Zeidanloo, Hossein Rouhani [1 ]
Sabeeh, Ahmed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, FCSIT, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTING (IACSIT ICMLC 2009) | 2009年
关键词
Bandwidth Allocation; Optical Network; Static Bandwidth Allocation; Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A detailed understanding of the many facets of the Internet's topological structure is critical for evaluating the performance of networking protocols, for assessing the effectiveness of proposed techniques to protect the network from nefarious intrusions and attacks, or for developing improved designs for resource provisioning. In this way Available bandwidth estimation is a vital component of admission control for quality-of-service (QoS) on Internet in the world. In coming years, Optical networks are come to dominate the access network space. Ethernet passive optical networks, which influence the all of subscriber locations of Ethernet, seems bound for success in the optical access network. In this Review Paper we first prepare an introduction to Ethernet passive optical networks structure, then related to our totally categorize the bandwidth allocation methods to three groups as Static and Router-Based and Windows-Based, we will explain seven major weaknesses on static group and describe the improvements on them one by one. Finally in this survey, we found some roles and principles in static bandwidth allocation methods which explain them separately. We hope in the next article we will explain the Dynamic bandwidth allocation weaknesses and improvements then make a comparison between static and dynamic bandwidth allocations. Following that, at the end, we will propose an algorithm on dynamic bandwidth allocation and evaluate it.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 503
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ANSARI YLA, 2005, J OPTICAL NETWORKING
[2]  
BARNAY YMA, 1998, COMPETITIVE DYNAMIC
[3]  
BARRIA RMS, 2004, FAIR EFFICIENT DYNAM
[4]  
BENHARDEKOPF TR, 2003, IMPACT NETWORK PROTO
[5]  
BOGGIA PCG, 2007, DYNAMIC BANDWIDTH AL
[6]  
BOUTABA YIA, 1999, DYNAMIC BANDWIDTH AL
[7]  
EVANS RPA, 2002, EXPERIENCES CLASS SE
[8]  
FARBER HKA, 1994, CONGESTION CONTROL B
[9]  
GUERIN YXA, 2005, ROBUSTNESS ROUTER BA
[10]  
KATABI MHA, 2003, INTERNET CONGESTION