Diversification and internationalization in the sociological study of science and religion

被引:16
作者
Catto, Rebecca Alice [1 ]
Jones, Stephen [2 ]
Kaden, Tom [3 ]
Elsdon-Baker, Fern [2 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Sociol, 215 Merrill Hall, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Theol & Religious Studies, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Bayreuth, Dept Cultural Sci, Bayreuth, Germany
来源
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS | 2019年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; EVOLUTION; CONFLICT; SCIENTISTS; ATTITUDES; CULTURE; SECULARIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; CREATIONISM; BOUNDARIES;
D O I
10.1111/soc4.12721
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Classical sociology addressed the relationship between science and religion, but interest in the topic waned during the 20th century. A second wave of research has emerged in the 21st century, focusing on scientists' (ir)religiosity, evolution, and the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of scientific concepts. Most of this research has been conducted in the United States, used quantitative methods, and focused on creationism, although scholars have recently begun to explore different research methods and sites. Their results suggest that the "conflict thesis" is not valid and that publics and scientists' views tend to be fluid and strongly shaped by national context. The literature on nonreligion has also expanded, but its connection to science remains ripe for further development. A more intersectional approach would also benefit the field, as would increased engagement between public understanding of science scholars and sociologists studying science and religion. Research in both areas is showing that attitudes toward science and religion cannot be understood solely in terms of knowledge about either domain. There is scope for more empirical and theoretical work internationally eschewing the assumption that science and religion conflict and focusing more on identity, culture, and power relations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Networking expertise: Discursive coalitions and collaborative networks of experts in a public creationism controversy in the UK
    Allgaier, Joachim
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (03) : 299 - 313
  • [2] Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics
    Allum, Nick
    Sibley, Elissa
    Sturgis, Patrick
    Stoneman, Paul
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (07) : 833 - 849
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, CONTENTIOUS CURRICUL, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400825455
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, God's Own Scientists: Creationists in a Secular World
  • [5] [Anonymous], SCI RELIG STEPS ANAL
  • [6] [Anonymous], HIST WARFARE SCI THE
  • [7] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
  • [9] [Anonymous], SCI RELIG NEW HIST P
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, US 42 BELIEVE CREATI