Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey

被引:46
作者
Kandathil, Cherian K. [1 ]
Saltychev, Mikhail [2 ,3 ]
Abdelwahab, Mohamed [4 ]
Spataro, Emily A. [5 ]
Moubayed, Sami P. [6 ]
Most, Sam P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 801 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[4] Mansoura Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Fac Med, Mansoura, Egypt
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[6] Univ Montreal, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dept Surg, Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjz070
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) has not been determined. Objectives The authors sought to define the MCID for both domains of the SCHNOS questionnaire. Methods This prospective cohort study included patients who underwent functional, cosmetic, or combined rhinoplasty operation from June 2017 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral center. The average preoperative, postoperative, and change in scores were calculated for the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE) and SCHNOS. Anchor-based MCIDs were estimated for both SCHNOS subscales to define change in obstruction and cosmesis perceived after the rhinoplasty. Results Eighty-seven patients (69% women, 31% males) with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 38 years (14.7) at the time of surgery were included. The mean postoperative follow-up period (SD) was 145 days (117). The mean preoperative score (SD) for the NOSE was 52 (32), SCHNOS for nasal obstruction (SCHNOS-O) score was 55 (33), and SCHNOS for nasal cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) score was 50 (26) points. Postoperatively, the NOSE score was 23 (22), SCHNOS-O score was 24 (23), and SCHNOS-C score was 13 (18) points. The mean change in scores (SD) for NOSE, SCHNOS-O, and SCHNOS-C was -29 (37), -31 (38), and -37 (28), respectively. The calculated MCID for SCHNOS-O was 26 (16) and for SCHNOS-C was 22 (15) points. The MCID for NOSE was 24 (13) points. A sensitivity test for the patients with a follow-up >= 3 months showed only slightly different MCID estimates: 28 (17) for SCHNOS-O, 18 (13) for SCHNOS-C, and 24 (15) points for NOSE. Conclusions For the obstruction domain SCHNOS-O, the MCID was 28 points. For the cosmetic domain SCHNOS-C, the MCID was 18 points.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 840
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ARCH FACIAL PLAST SU, DOI DOI 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198
[2]   The Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID): What Difference Does It Make? [J].
Bernstein, Jonathan A. ;
Mauger, Dave T. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2016, 4 (04) :689-690
[3]   Clinical Practice Guideline: Improving Nasal Form and Function after Rhinoplasty [J].
Ishii, Lisa E. ;
Tollefson, Travis T. ;
Basura, Gregory J. ;
Rosenfeld, Richard M. ;
Abramson, Peter J. ;
Chaiet, Scott R. ;
Davis, Kara S. ;
Doghramji, Karl ;
Farrior, Edward H. ;
Finestone, Sandra A. ;
Ishman, Stacey L. ;
Murphy, Robert X., Jr. ;
Park, John G. ;
Setzen, Michael ;
Strike, Deborah J. ;
Walsh, Sandra A. ;
Warner, Jeremy P. ;
Nnacheta, Lorraine C. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 156 :S1-S30
[4]   FACE-Q Scales for Health-Related Quality of Life, Early Life Impact, Satisfaction with Outcomes, and Decision to Have Treatment: Development and Validation [J].
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Schwitzer, Jonathan A. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (02) :375-386
[5]   A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale [J].
Lee, Matthew K. ;
Most, Sam P. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (02)
[6]   Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Allergic Rhinitis: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or Anchor-Based Thresholds? [J].
Meltzer, Eli O. ;
Wallace, Dana ;
Dykewicz, Mark ;
Shneyer, Lucy .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2016, 4 (04) :682-+
[7]   The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty [J].
Moubayed, Sami P. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Saltychev, Mikhail ;
Most, Sam P. .
JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 20 (01) :37-42
[8]   Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey [J].
Saltychev, Mikhail ;
Kandathil, Cherian K. ;
Abdelwahab, Mohamed ;
Spataro, Emily A. ;
Moubayed, Sami P. ;
Most, Sam P. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (02) :454E-456E
[9]   Psychometric Properties of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey: Item Response Theory Analysis [J].
Saltychev, Mikhail ;
Kandathil, Cherian K. ;
Abdelwahab, Mohamed ;
Spataro, Emily A. ;
Moubayed, Sarni P. ;
Most, Sam P. .
JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 20 (06) :519-521
[10]   Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Appearance and Quality of Life following Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q Appraisal Scales [J].
Schwitzer, Jonathan A. ;
Sher, Sarah R. ;
Fan, Kenneth L. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Gamble, Laurie ;
Baker, Stephen B. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (05) :830E-837E